Home » Why This Special Diesel Fuel Costs Over $20,000 Per Gallon

Why This Special Diesel Fuel Costs Over $20,000 Per Gallon

Img 7355
ADVERTISEMENT

Now and then, we all find ourselves complaining about fuel prices. That stuff can be expensive, especially if you’re stuck fueling up in a gas station in the middle of nowhere that can gouge you on the price. If you want to buy really expensive fuel, though? Head over to the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Yes, the government agency will be more than happy to sell you some incredibly expensive diesel, if that’s what you need. You can get a bottle of SRM-2723b, which contains 100 mL (roughly 0.1 quarts) of Number 2 diesel. It’s not especially good diesel, but that tiny bottle will set you back a full $530.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

Putting that in context, a 2024 Ram 1500 has a 25.9 gallon tank. To brim that tank, you’d need 980 bottles of NIST diesel. In total, you’d be billed $520,000 to fill the tank. A Ford F-150’s 30.6-gallon tank would cost you over $600,000, and you’d have a massive pile of glass bottles to dispose of afterwards. I guess you could throw them in the bed? But let’s explore what’s going on here.

Nist Not Cheap
$530 for 100 mL equals out to $20,034 a gallon. Turns out sulfur in diesel fuel oil is a lot more expensive than tuna in brine.

“Surely there must be something special about SRM-2723b to make it so expensive?!” you exclaim. You’re asking the right questions. SRM-2723b is a Standard Reference Material, specifically referred to as “Sulfur” in Diesel Oil. When you fork over $530, NIST provides you with 100 mL (0.1 quarts) of diesel with a tiny and precise amount of sulfur content, and a certificate stating that fact.

See, the National Institute of Standards and Technology has an important job when it comes to producing these  reference materials, which are used widely in science and industry. These materials are not intended to be used for their usual purpose. For example, you’re not supposed to put NIST Standard Reference Peanut Butter on a sandwich. You could, but it’s real purpose is meant to aid in industry testing. When a company tests its own peanut butter for things like fat and sugar content, it needs a way of calibrating its tests to ensure they’re accurate. By running the same test on NIST’s standard peanut butter, for which known values exist, the test can be verified as needed. The organization itself explains the matter well in regards to the food industry:

ADVERTISEMENT

Food manufacturers use the SRMs to calibrate their test methods and equipment. If their tests of our SRMs do not give them the answers that we say they should, they know that something has gone wrong with their tests and they have some adjustments to make. Once their results agree with ours, they know that their tests are properly calibrated and they can then accurately label their products with nutritional information and consumers can know that they are getting a balanced diet (or not, no judgment). When a company buys an SRM from NIST, they are really buying all of the measurements and scientific expertise that went into determining its chemical or physical properties, as well as NIST’s level of certainty regarding those measurements. After all, knowing how good your measurement is is as important as knowing the measurement itself, which is why NIST works constantly to improve measurement science.

NIST sells some 1,300 SRMs that help a variety of industries make sure they are meeting regulations or industry standards that help ensure the safety and consistency of their products, among other characteristics.

But the food and beverage SRMs can present unique challenges, in particular to NIST staff. Said one anonymous researcher, “I remember the trouble I had with the baking chocolate SRM. Never before during my sample prep had I wanted to ‘catch the drip’ on the lip of the beaker with my finger and eat it.”

Nist Peanut Butter
This is actually not what it’s for. That jar of peanut butter costs $1,143.

These reference materials have to adhere rigidly to standards. To that end, they’re produced with great care, and assessed to ensure they contain precisely what NIST says is in them. This takes lots of lab work and testing, which is all very expensive. Combine that with the fact that there is only a very limited market for these materials, and that only small amounts are required, and you can understand why the cost is so high.

If you’re putting NIST standard diesel in your truck, for example, you’re effectively setting your money on fire. To that end, I’m not even sure NIST produces 26 gallons of standard diesel a year. Back when NIST used to put out a standard B100 Biodiesel product, it only produced one 55-gallon drum of the stuff. If you ordered a sample, you’d get five ampoules for 50 mL in total—the same size as a single American shot glass.

Cigarette Tb
“You’re smoking Marlboros? Nah, fam, I only smoke NIST.”

NIST produces a whole lot of these standard materials for all kinds of purposes. There are food standards, chemical standards, and even standard bullets for forensic purposes.

The one thing that disappoints me about NIST’s Standard Reference Materials? Most of the fun ones aren’t automotive-themed. There’s NIST Domestic Sludge, NIST standard cigarettes, NIST Baby Food Composite, and the classic SRM-1546a NIST’s beloved Meat Homogenate. Heck—you can even get frozen NIST standard urine, in both smoking and non-smoking varieties! I’m not even making that up!

Nistmaterials (1)
“Domestic Sludge? What tests do you use that for?” “Tests? No, I just brought this from home and labelled it for safekeeping.
Screenshot 2024 11 29 155307
From NIST: “Solomon Park Research Laboratories, Inc. acquired a 25 L pool of smokers’ urine from donors who smoked more than one pack of cigarettes per day.” That’s how you know you’re getting a quality product.

What you can’t get are funny labelled bottles of “Standard Gasoline” or “Standard Diesel.” They’d make a gorgeous header image for this article and we could all have a few good laughs. But no, NIST has to make my life hard by not doing that. The organization actually used to produce a wider range of standard diesel and gasoline products, but most have been discontinued in recent years.

ADVERTISEMENT

These days, the selection is more limited. NIST will sell you the aforementioned Sulfur in Diesel Fuel Oil, while a similar Sulfur in Gasoline product is currently restricted from sale.  You can still get Diesel Particulate Matter, if that floats your boat. Meanwhile, the Lubricating Oil Additive Package is useful if you’re analyzing various types of engine oil.

Nistmaterials (3)

Nistmaterials (5)

Nistmaterials (4)
Pictured: The three worst Christmas gifts I could possibly imagine.

There are a number of crude oil products, too, including Weathered Gulf of Mexico Crude Oil in Toluene, sampled from the Deepwater Horizon spill in 201o. That’ll set you back $1,310 for just 6 mL—one of the few fluids on earth that costs more than printer ink.

Unless you’re a chemist of the research or industrial variety, you’ll probably never come across these materials in your life time. Still, it’s funny to think about refueling a truck with some of the most expensive fuel on the planet.

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: NIST

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
26 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Harrnack
Harrnack
1 hour ago

Cue the YouTuber who buys 1000 bottles to fill his brodozer and do a half-million dollar coal roll.

1978fiatspyderfan
1978fiatspyderfan
2 hours ago

$320,000 and 980 bottles? Please tell me I get a deposit back on each of them bottles.

American Locomotive
American Locomotive
4 hours ago

The purpose of this particular diesel reference is that all diesel sold in the U.S. needs to be “Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel” (ULSD). ULSD’s sulfur limit is 10ppm – exactly what this bottle is.

So you would use this to calibrate your production test equipment against.

Hugh Crawford
Hugh Crawford
4 hours ago

This video is for you
https://youtu.be/crjxpZHv7Hk

Knowonelse
Knowonelse
2 hours ago
Reply to  Hugh Crawford

And the antidote to that is Ann Reardon’s YouTube channel whcih debunks such videos. Here’s the one on that cookie that goes into detail about the “perfect” ingredients.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YqYAWF7wd9k

Hugh Crawford
Hugh Crawford
40 minutes ago
Reply to  Knowonelse

Well, I don’t know if that’s a debunking, and I don’t think the ingredients were supposed to be perfect, they’re supposed to be a measurablely verified standard.

It’s the sort of like the difference between precision and accuracy, the expensive stuff is precise but not accurate. If something were perfect, it would be accurate, but not necessarily precise.

German manufacturers for example are all about precision, not so much accuracy ie there may be be a lot of variation in the parts, but the parts are selected to work with each other other.

The Japanese on the other hand are all about accuracy so that the parts may have an error, but they all have the same error, so matching parts is not as much of an issue.

RKranc
RKranc
1 hour ago
Reply to  Hugh Crawford
Canopysaurus
Canopysaurus
4 hours ago

Those must’ve been NIST eggs I bought this week.

Urban Runabout
Urban Runabout
5 hours ago

I am now offering my standard non-smoking urine at half-price.
Because Black Friday.

Sklooner
Sklooner
4 hours ago
Reply to  Urban Runabout

Had somebody wanting to buy my urine once, I was tempted but only because I know it would have failed every drug test they put it through

Freelivin2713
Freelivin2713
5 hours ago

Pffth…No NIST Ham? (For my bumpers)

Spikedlemon
Spikedlemon
5 hours ago

It’s so American that the NIST SRM2387 for Peanutbutter isn’t straight peanuts.

Makes me wonder how each brand compares against the NIST standard for added sugar.

Urban Runabout
Urban Runabout
5 hours ago
Reply to  Spikedlemon

It’s JIF

Rad Barchetta
Rad Barchetta
5 hours ago
Reply to  Spikedlemon

Making peanut butter using only peanuts without adding sugar or salt or something else to modify the taste or texture is a modern thing brought on by health food stores and organic food crazes.

Spikedlemon
Spikedlemon
4 hours ago
Reply to  Rad Barchetta

It’s really the sugar that is such an unecessary ingredient IMHO.

Kellogg’s initial patent (US Pattent 604493 granted 1898) lists water as an adder, and suggests salt and/or fruit other options for flavour and nutrition respectvely. Though was oddly called “Ailmentary Product” – maybe inline with Kellogg’s rather odd views of nutrition.

Interestingly, a separate patent (US Pattent 306727 granted 1894) calls out “Peanut Candy” where peanut paste (peanutbutter as we might now call it) is mixed with sugar.

So I would propose that sugar might have been an early additive, but it wasn’t referred to peanut butter, and would have been called a Candy even from the start.

1978fiatspyderfan
1978fiatspyderfan
2 hours ago
Reply to  Spikedlemon

What did they call peanut brittle?

Hugh Crawford
Hugh Crawford
4 hours ago
Reply to  Rad Barchetta

If it’s what you are used to, the other stuff tastes really weird.

Hoonicus
Hoonicus
4 hours ago
Reply to  Rad Barchetta

Crazy Richards! One ingredient since 1898! Not pleased they switched from glass to plastic jars. If you read almost any other label, they add @#$%& palm oil! That’s insane! There is already too much peanut oil when you grind!

Usernametaken
Usernametaken
3 hours ago
Reply to  Hoonicus

You know the palm oil (and soy lethecin) is to keep it from separating, right?

Hoonicus
Hoonicus
3 hours ago
Reply to  Usernametaken

When did stirring become a bridge too far? Palm oil has become ubiquitous in processed foods to the detriment of not only consumers health, but of the rain forest as well.

Hoonicus
Hoonicus
2 hours ago
Reply to  Usernametaken

Doesn’t everyone have an Ultrasonic homogenizer ?

1978fiatspyderfan
1978fiatspyderfan
2 hours ago
Reply to  Spikedlemon

I wonder if they have a chunky version that has a certain peanut percentage content?

Cheap Bastard
Cheap Bastard
5 hours ago

“If you’re putting NIST standard diesel in your truck, for example, you’re effectively setting your money on fire”

Yore doing that with pump diesel too! And gasoline, natural gas, heating oil etc.

The difference is you get a lot less fire for your buck.

Nic Periton
Nic Periton
5 hours ago

I like that all the labels are standard, Oh. I should have been testing peanut butter, this sandwich tastes as if some dropped it at a truck stop. Could be worse I suppose, that time Sara confused the urine with the baby food was funny.

Sklooner
Sklooner
6 hours ago

I only buy imported sludge none of that common stuff for me.

Hoonicus
Hoonicus
5 hours ago
Reply to  Sklooner

Moet&Chandon Champagne, Beluga caviar, Wolfsberg sludge.

26
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x