There is no drug quite like nostalgia because it’s a drug that no two people experience the same way. A bite of Count Chocula is just surgary cereal to my daughter, but to me it’s a time machine that takes me back to my own childhood. Marcel Proust had it right. Also, Proust would have driven the ever-lovin’ crap out of this two-door Toyota.
The automaker says the 4Runner TRD Surf Concept “draws inspiration from an iconic time in history when the Toyota 4Runner became a staple at 80s So-Cal beaches, as surfers sought the perfect wave.” If you were a surfer in that period and that geography maybe it means something to you. It does not to me.
What the 4Runner represents to me, more than anything, was a time when you could actually get a two-door SUV. Because an SUV didn’t have to be a vehicle for everyone it was expected back then that the base option for one of these trucks was the omission of the rear doors.
More than anything, the success of the Ford Explorer and the shift from SUV-as-truck to SUV-as-family-wagon killed the two-door model. It was too much money and too much time to build one for too few customers. The same is starting to happen with actual pickup trucks.
We need to go back to building two-door SUVs and Toyota is the perfect automaker to do it.
We Are At An Undesirable Moment In History
The period leading up to 2020 could have been the apotheosis of car choice in the ICE era. There were a large number of models available, in various configurations, giving consumers a Golden Corral’s worth of options.
Just looking at the sixth-generation S550 Ford Mustang you could walk out with a convertible V6 automatic cruiser, an EcoBoost 2.3-liter inline-four fastback set up for track duty, and any number of V8s producing up to 760 horsepower. The Toyota Camry at various points was available as a coupe, a convertible, a sedan, and a wagon.
But, somewhere in the late teens, automakers started shifting money to electric cars. The assumption was that electrification would be a must and therefore it would be undesirable to make a lot of different small platforms given the investment that was necessary.
Toyota didn’t quite fall into this trap and instead focused more on offering various powertrains, especially hybrids, but it too fell victim to some lineup oversimplification. It’s in this period that we witnessed the death of sedans/cars/coupes from most automakers and the obliteration of other fun niche models. At no point in my career can I remember fewer interesting submodels than right now in North America. Remember when Mercedes-Benz used to make a coupe and convertible version of basically everything? Now the coupes have been rationalized down to the CLE Cabriolet and SL Roadster (itself the merger of two vehicle lines).
I hate this. I super hate this. Eventually, electrification and extremely modular platforms might lead to a neo-Cambrian era of model explosion like we’re seeing in China, but that’s many years away.
Until then, it’s boring and I’m not even sure it’s great business.
Why?
Toyota reported that its sales, though up significantly this year, were down year-over-year in October by 8.0%. This is due to a number of factors, but the highest among them is the stop-sale of the Grand Highlander and Lexus TX equivalents. These were supposed to be key vehicles for the automaker, but a pesky recall has kept them from being sold and hampered sales.
Is simplifying the lineup so much that you produce too many versions of the same vehicle actually a risk? The costs of engineering a bunch of vehicles on the same platform under the same nameplate are definitely high, but automakers are already spending that money to extend platforms. There’s probably a diminishing return on building and marketing (also expensive) niche models, but if we can have five two-row SUV/crossovers (RAV4, Corolla Cross, Crown Signia, 4Runner, Venza) and four three-row SUV/crossovers (Land Cruiser, Highlander, Highlander Max, Sequoia) from Toyota isn’t there room for at least one of these?
Back in the ’90s and ’00s you could get a two-door Pathfinder, Navajo, Explorer, Tahoe, Yukon, Vehicross, Amigo, Freelander, Trooper, and even a two-door 4Runner. Given that essentially all of those vehicles are gone, perhaps now is the time to get all of that untapped market.
The Actual TRD Surf Concept Is Cool
That was all a bit of an aside as the actual TRD Surf Concept, which will be at SEMA next week, is pretty rad as the kids don’t say.
Toyota started with a 2025 4Runner TRD Limited equipped with the iForce 2.4-liter turbo motor, so already there’s 278 horsepower and 317 lb-ft of torque on hand, all put down via a full-time 4WD system and an electronically controlled dual-range transfer case. From a powertrain perspective, the only real upgrade is a custom exhaust.
The suspension gets a little more work with custom front axles, billet aluminum front upper and lower A-arms, and the rear-end housing from a Tundra. All of this is connected to custom 17-inch wheels supporting 37-inch tires.
To be a “surf” truck the first thing that has to go is the roof and, from there, the logic is quite clear. To take the roof off you don’t want a set of rear doors to deal with so those got tossed and a custom-built top was created. I’m glad they didn’t try to make a four-door convertible because those usually look wrong when built using modern vehicles.
A shortened version of the 4Runner, complete with bigger flared fenders and a roll hoop just feels right. There’s no cognitive leap necessary to accept this as exactly what an SUV should be. And while the little surfing touches like the waterproof interior and retro graphics are fun, no part of this seems impossible for a brand like Toyota to engineer.
I suppose one might argue that you can just build an SR5 Xtra Cab 4×4 that approximates a lot of this utility, it doesn’t look as cool. Nothing looks quite as cool as this.
There are a lot of SEMA concepts from a lot of automakers that probably shouldn’t be built and I have no real belief that Toyota is going to do anything other than trot this around for a year, relegate it to a basement, and crush it because that’s what always happens.
I’m an optimist. I am audacious enough to have hope. Maybe if enough people respond positively to this concept Toyota will do what others have been afraid to do and give us a real, honest-to-goodness two-door SUV.
I have been BEGGING for this since I was a teenager. My dream truck is an 86-89 long travel. I very nearly cut the back of the cab out of my 05 and put a canopy on it. My wife talked me out of it last second
are those surfboards secure? Not very mahalo to have your board get wasted on ventura highway on your way to surf, my bro…
If this makes it to production it will be a TRD sticker pack for the 4runner. Thats all.
I’m really surprised everyone’s letting the Wrangler and Bronco run free in that market space. Chevy keeps messing up the Blazer, Toyota’s Rav4 Actually started as a 2-door, the R used to be for Recreational!
Maybe Kia or Hyundai will give it some thought, make a 2-door Santa Cruz with a couple rear facing back seats all BRAT style.
I love this, I hope it gets a lot of love at SEMA that forces them to really think about building a removable top 4runner again. I say this as my daily is a 1986 4runner with 255000 on the odometer. The Bronco proved that it is possible and worth it to build something cool when everything else is saying not to.
I’m 100% sure you meant to write ‘omission’ where the article reads ‘comission’!
and iForce 2.4 instead of Force 2.4
Grammerly really killing me today. Thank you!
I’m still wondering what surgery cereal is, is the Count doing surgery now?
Was the Commission of the Rear Doors like the 9/11 Commission? The Warren Commission? The Trilateral Commission? Has day-drinking amongst Autopian staff spread from west to East?
There’s not a chance in hell that Toyota will build this for the US market.
Because the Chicken Tax is still a thing.
It’s got four seats, so that lets it escape the pickup category.
2-door SUVs are considered “light trucks” by Customs, that ruling came in 1990 and was why all the 2-door Japanese SUVs were dropped within a couple years while the domestics ran the rest of their design cycles at minimum.
Thanks, I missed that.
The TRD Surf is exactly what I want in a smallish truck. Of course that’s why Toyota won’t ever build it, or if they do they’ll screw it up by making it four doors and fixed roof. A manual trans would make it perfect, but I’d take a 2-door, flip top with auto, if I must.
I think Toyota’s ROX concept has a better chance of seeing the light of day, but that one doesn’t excite me at all.
I’ve seen too many enticing concept vehicles come and go and either never get built or get bastardized by corporate think (looking at you most recently Hyundai Santa Cruz).
The Wrangler 2-door has evolved into a fat warthog and Stellantis would love to kill it off, anyway. The Bronco 2-door is just too big and really only appeals to me in its Legacy trim. Toyota even spoiled the new Tacoma 2-door by dropping the manual as an option and it’s still too large for me anyway. Scout isn’t going to do it, either, no matter what they tease. Suzuki and Isuzu are likely never coming back and after seeing the Tasman, I don’t know what to expect from Kia. A new Subaru BRAT would be nice, but not the Baja, or more specifically, not just the Baja. The only company that might actually have the balls to build a new compact 2-door SUV for the US is probably Nissan, but they don’t have the cash or management.
So, it’s down to Toyota. Come on, be the leader for once and give 2-door aficionados a treat. Build the TRD Surf. Please.
You think a 2 door Bronco is too big? This is a full size 4 door SUV with the rear doors welded shut and a wider track width than stock.
What you want is a Bronco Sport with added inconvenience. I don’t know how the actual dimensions compare but even a Rav4 feels too big to be considered a compact SUV.
The Bronco is much larger than a Forerunner, which the Surf is based upon.
Length: The Bronco is up to 8 inches longer than the 4Runner (comparing 4-door to 4-door)
Width: The Bronco is up to 10 inches wider than the 4Runner
Height: The Bronco is up to 7 inches taller than the 4Runner
Wheelbase: The 4Runner’s wheelbase is 109.8 inches, while the Bronco’s is up to 116.1 inches
Ground clearance: The 4Runner’s ground clearance is 9.6 inches, Bronco 8.3 inches.
They didn’t release specs for the Surf except to say its track is 2 inches wider than the normal Forerunner, which still makes it much narrower than the Bronco. I tried to find out if the wheelbase was shorter in the Surf than the Forerunner, but it’s unclear. One write up said they’d chopped the Forerunner down to create the Surf, but included no details, so I take that with a large grain of salt.
I do agree with you that these smaller SUVs and trucks are not truly compact vehicles, which, for me, would be ideal. And the Bronco Sport is not body on frame, though if I’m honest with myself, the latest unibody designs can do everything I’d need an SUV or truck to do. So, not a deal killer. I do hate the Bronco Sport appearance, though.
You can watch a truncated behind-the-scenes 2 part video series on Toyota’s YT. Highly recommended if you’re interested in this project. Anyway, there was nothing in the videos to suggest they shortened the wheelbase.
To your original comment, this concept is longer than a 2 door Bronco with which you were comparing. And I’d like to see stats on the width of the body for a more apples to apples comparison. The removable fenders on the BoF Broncos add at least 8″ total width. Granted, if you removed them, the tires would still be sticking out.
But I’m with you. I’d be much more comfortable off-roading in a smaller vehicle. Best of both worlds is my dream of an old mini truck with solid axles and big tires like Dave Chapelle’s (not that one) MazGrande.
I’ll look for the video. I’ve found four more references that say the wheelbase on the Surf is shorter than the standard Forerunner, but again, no details so I can’t confirm it.
Mini trucks rule (except on the highway). Doubt I’ll ever see anything new that small again unless I move to another country.
What incentive does Toyota have to make this when they can’t keep any of their other SUVs in stock?
It all comes down to the numbers. There are potential buyers, like me, who will never buy a 4-door suv or truck. Rather buy old vehicles and rehab to get what I want than submit to the “you’ll get nothing and like it,” choices out there. I don’t want a “family car” SUV. Again, there has to be enough people like me for Toyota to go ahead with the Surf. I see a lot of enthusiasm across the internet, but that doesn’t always translate to customers, I know. Sure beats an ID Buzz all to hell for a fun design.
I can’t stand that my Fiesta ST is a 4-door. It’s such a little car, getting in and out of those Recaros through that tiny door is annoying.
Once 4 door sedans and even SUVs could be called “coupes” or Grand Coupes” there seemed to be no need to actually produce 2 door vehicles anymore.
Bad trend.
As a former first gen 4Runner owner, I approve. Especially since this does not have a 3.0 V6.
What they need to do first is make the Manual Transmission available for the 2 Door Tacoma.
Why is it we can only get the manual transmission on the heavier vehicle?