Home » Honda And Nissan Should Just Be One Company

Honda And Nissan Should Just Be One Company

Tmd Nissan Type R2
ADVERTISEMENT

Peugeot and Citroën are one company. Fiat and Chrysler are one company. Actually, all of those companies are one company now. Why not Nissan and Honda? It would make almost too much sense.

I start this morning’s The Morning Dump (ok, by the time it’s done it’ll only be morning in California, but it’s been one of those days) with news that Honda and Nissan are teaming up on electric cars. Given that many markets they’re in will mandate a huge number of electric cars going forward it makes me wonder why they don’t just become one company.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

Perhaps it’ll make them more competitive in China? That’ll be important as both BMW and Volkswagen are reporting first-half financials and both are struggling in the Chinese market.

Toyota isn’t struggling as much with profits still going up, thanks in large part to hybrids.

The Case For Honda-Nissan

Honda Nissan Execs

ADVERTISEMENT

The Japanese car market was never big enough to support a homegrown industry focused entirely on itself, which is why Japan became the great automotive exporter of the 20th century. You can go anywhere in the world and find a Toyota, Nissan, or Honda product.

China would like this new century to be defined by exports of Chinese cars, and there’s some evidence they may succeed, but I wouldn’t count out Japan just yet. Carmakers there are still profitable, the engineers remain some of the world’s best, and there’s been a renewed effort to prepare for whatever is to come.

For the last two decades, Japanese automakers have slowly started to coalesce. Daihatsu was swallowed whole by Toyota. Then Subaru teamed up with Toyota. Mazda, once it was separated from Ford, also entered a long-term relationship with… Toyota.

Nissan tried to save itself by teaming up with Renault, which worked until it very much didn’t. Mitsubishi almost failed and was appended onto Nissan at the last minute.

Honda is the one Japanese automaker that’s mostly avoided consolidation, but even Honda has had to partner with other companies to survive. The current generation of Honda and Acura electric cars are based on GM-built Ultium platforms. Honda is also planning to build cars with Sony under a new joint venture.

ADVERTISEMENT

In general, Japanese automakers have lagged in EV development as they’ve pursued hybridization (which has worked) and hydrogenization (which hasn’t yet).

A hesitancy towards electrification has worked to the advantage of Japanese automakers for now, but Japanese car execs don’t seem to believe this is going to last and want to be prepared for a new, electrified future with software-defined vehicles that are judged as much on their interfaces as their driving performance.

To that end, Honda and Nissan announced a major partnership today. From the press release:

Nissan and Honda are engaged in specific discussions and deliberations with a view to collaborating in various fields to further accelerate efforts to realize a carbon-neutral and traffic-accident-free society. Both companies are promoting R&D and investment in various technologies to promote the spread and evolution of EVs, especially SDVs, which are the scope of study in the fields of intelligence and electrification.

The two companies also believe that the software field, including autonomous driving, connectivity, and AI, which will determine the value of vehicles in the future and become a source of competitiveness, is an area where technological innovation is extremely rapid and where synergies can easily be obtained through the fusion of resources from both companies, such as technological knowledge and human resources.

Here’s what really caught my eye:

With the models to be sold globally by Nissan and Honda, the two companies will consider supplementing models from a short-term to medium- to long-term perspective. For the short-term, Nissan and Honda reached a basic agreement on models and regions to be complemented by each company, and also agreed on the outline of a product review system to be jointly operated by both companies.
ICE and EVs are being considered as vehicles for mutual complementation.

That sounds like building cars together to me. And why not? Toyota has a market cap of almost $300 billion. Honda and Nissan, combined, have a market cap of less than $70 billion. Nissan couldn’t make the Renault relationship work because the underlying concept of a Japanese company being owned by the French state was a bridge too far.

ADVERTISEMENT

A consolidated Nissan and Honda bring engineering and manufacturing scale without the huge culture clash. I also don’t think their products are so similar that they can’t work in concert. Nissan/Mitsubishi have a truck competency that Honda lacks whereas Honda is way better at building hybrids.

This could just be another tie-up. Or it could be the start of a beautiful friendship.

BMW Getting Hosed Because Of China

P90546729 Highres Bmw Xmcoachella Fest (1)
BMW’s even got the influencers out repping them at Coachella.

German companies are coming out with their first half financial reports and they’re nicht gut. Let’s start with BMW (you can read the company’s report here).

Profits are down 8.6% quarter-over-quarter and 14.2% year-over-year. Margin so far this year has dropped to 11.6% from 16.2% at the same point in 2023. Car deliveries are about in line with last year, so what’s happening?

The pandemic shortages have waned and incentives are up, so that doesn’t help, but also… China.

ADVERTISEMENT

In China, consumer confidence remains low despite the measures implemented by the central government, as a result of which sales were held down to a level below expectations.

BMW thinks it can improve there, assuming there are no retaliatory tariffs. It was fun while it lasted.

VW: We Gotta Cut

Small 35539 Oliverblumeceovolkswagengroup

Volkswagen (report here) is facing some of the same dilemmas and is hoping to cut its way to better margins as the operating margin hit 6.3% for the first half of the year (though it improved slightly in Q2).

Here’s what CFO/COO Arno Antlitz had to say:

“Our second quarter margin, before restructuring costs and other non-operational factors, came in slightly above our expectations. But what ultimately counts is the reported result. A margin of 6.3% after six months is below our ambitions and potential, given our array of great vehicles, our brand portfolio, and our global footprint. Given the expected product momentum and a solid order book, we confirm our outlook for the full year. However, we must make significant efforts on the cost side in the second half and beyond in order to achieve our targets.”

That sounds like “cut cut cut” to me.

ADVERTISEMENT

Toyota Is Still Making Money

Toyota Koji Sato

Toyota is still bringing in big profits in spite of the company’s latest issues, due in large part to hybrids.

From Automotive News:

In the April-June fiscal first quarter, electrified vehicle sales — including standard and plug-in hybrids as well as full electric vehicles — climbed 24 percent to 1.08 million vehicles.

Standard hybrids, exemplified by the Prius, shot up 24 percent to 998,000 vehicles.

Electrified vehicles accounted for 43 percent of the company’s global retail sales in the quarter, up from 34 percent a year earlier. Total global retail sales at Toyota Motor dropped 4.2 percent to 2.64 million vehicles in the quarter.

Gasoline-electric hybrid cars help bolster Toyota’s bottom line because hybrids typically have fatter margins and command higher sticker prices. They are also in high demand as consumers gravitate toward them as a more affordable, more practical alternative to full electric vehicles.

That’s almost a million hybrids a quarter. They’ll get there.

What I’m Listening To While Writing TMD

ADVERTISEMENT

One more for the Gen-exers. Here’s “Seether” by Veruca Salt.

The Big Question

Could Honda-Nissan work? Am I losing my mind?

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
121 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Clueless_jalop
Clueless_jalop
1 month ago

I guess I’ll be one of the few optimists here and say that a Honda-Nissan-Mitsubishi partnership could work quite nicely. For starters, if Nissan & Mitsubishi continue their downward trajectory, and Subaru & Mazda stay with Toyota, Honda could end up being the only major domestic competitor to Toyota, and that would be less than ideal, to say the least. Now to Toyota’s credit, Subaru and Mazda have retained a good degree of autonomy, and Suzuki is still doing fairly well as a more minor, independent player, but still.

Also, while it’s easy to look at the failures of Nissan and Mitsubishi over the last 10-20 years, you also have to recognize the things they have been and are doing well. The R35 GTR was a brilliant car, the Z cars have maintained their popularity, the Frontier/Navara (while a little on the conservative side) are great trucks, and Nissan has been making EVs for quite some time. And while it’s probably too long ago now to really be relevant, Mitsubishi was doing great things with their AWD systems. (With the possible exception of the GT-R) all of those are segments that Honda either hasn’t entered at all, or they’ve only gotten far enough into it to check the box.

Lastly, are there really any better partners for Honda or Nissan? The GM and Renault partnerships haven’t been great, Ford & VW are tied up, BMW and Volvo are working with Chinese companies, JLR is doing whatever voodoo they do, Mercedes and Hyundai-Kia are doing just fine on their own, and Stellantis has their hands full with all of their various companies.

Hr206
Hr206
1 month ago

Dumbest article ever. Honda has more or less made very successful, thoughtfully engineered cars and has always stayed true to their formula. Perennially solid cars that attract buyers from high demographics. Nissan sells cars to people with 300 credit scores that need to run from the police. Nobody wants to diversify by going down in the market.

Col Lingus
Col Lingus
1 month ago

Honda and Nissan? Seriously?

That would be the equivalent of Taylor Swift and DT hooking up over their love of cats.

Or Jennifer Anniston and Jon Lovitz (pictured above) getting together.

Or like Forest Gump and Heidi Klum doing the nasty thang.

Or George Costanza and the honorable Senator Elizabeth Warren.

Or…well you get the idea.
Some things are just not a good idea.

Last edited 1 month ago by Col Lingus
Mall Explorer
Mall Explorer
1 month ago

Honda will probably not acquire another company until every last person at Honda who has ever lived through the Rover era has retired. Post-Rover, Honda’s MO has always been limited JVs where it makes sense, e.g. quickly badge-sharing with Isuzu to fill each other’s gaps until Honda brings its own full-size SUV offerings online, engine sharing with GM until they have a competitive diesel offering in Europe, and this Ultium thing until this Nissan JV is up.

What I’m seeing out of this JV is a Honda-styled Ariya and maybe a replacement Altima on last-generation Accord mechanicals.

Aaron Vienot
Aaron Vienot
1 month ago

Honda already offers an overpriced compact truck and has shown no interest in switching to BoF, has a full range of reliable ICE designs, does not require subprime finance to move its vehicles, and can develop EV tech in joint ventures. What does it need from Nissan beyong the JV agreement, exactly?

Freelivin2713
Freelivin2713
1 month ago

No, don’t ruin Honda by having it associated w/ those crazy Altima drivers, ha ha. No Thank you.
How many more mergers are needed? Eventually if there are only a handful of companies that would be less interesting as far as the cars go (well, most new cars are boring blobs that all look the same anyway…most, not all)

CJ J
CJ J
1 month ago
Reply to  Freelivin2713

I mean I wouldn’t dump on altima drivers if you drive a sedan or boring crossover.

Freelivin2713
Freelivin2713
1 month ago
Reply to  CJ J

No matter, at least it’s a reliable daily driver (I can’t help that I don’t have an enthusiast car yet but that’s the dream)…it’s because of the funny Altima reputation/stereotype anyway

CJ J
CJ J
1 month ago
Reply to  Freelivin2713

I drove a first-gen altima for 11 years (up until 2022) which allowed me to have enough for the enthusiast car. Seems like the transition to CVT marks the beginning of terrible altima drivers. And yes, I’m in the big altima energy group on facebook, so the stereotype is humorous.

Segador
Segador
1 month ago

Counterpoint: Nissan is trash and should disappear

Manuel Verissimo
Manuel Verissimo
1 month ago
Reply to  Segador

Nissan used to be great so maybe they can redeem themselves somehow.

My ownership of a Z may be tainting my opinion.

Aaron
Aaron
1 month ago

I’m a bit of a Honda fanboy. I admit that. But I don’t really see what Nissan has to offer that Honda couldn’t figure out on their own or source from a better partner. Outside the botched first mover advantage in BEVs with the Leaf and some also-ran trucks, it seems like a more in-depth cooperation or merger has little benefit for Honda but tons of upside for Nissan.

Unless the Japanese government is trying to push this through, buoying Nissan with Honda’s relative success, I don’t see this being anything like a merger.

MY LEG!
MY LEG!
1 month ago

Hell no.

A) My trust-buster instinct instantly pegs when consolidating two household names.

B) This sort of merger? Where one party is at the bottom of public sentiment because of mismanagement while one is relatively pristine?

This comparison to McD-Douglas/Boeing is overwrought, but it’s hard not to point at the fact we got two astronauts stuck on the ISS because of people doing the same sort of merger in aerospace, where they are paid infinite money to get it right the first time.

And you want this to happen in consumer vehicles too where the margins are infinitely tighter?

C) I refuse to be driving a nameplate that’s destined to be an upmarket Altima. I bought my DD Accord because it’s inoffensive enough to get around without people noticing me.

Last edited 1 month ago by MY LEG!
JumboG
JumboG
1 month ago

Here’s the big problem as I see it. Honda does stuff differently. Things like have automatic transmissions designed totally independently of everyone else’s because they wouldn’t pay for the rights. Some of their engines spin backwards to everyone else’s and as a result the transmission is on the opposite side of the car from most. You see where I’m going here. It’s hard for Honda to ‘share’ technology with other companies. Any joint cars are either rebadged Hondas (Sterling), or another car badged as a Honda (Isuzu Trooper-Passport) until Honda can design one of their own.

None the less, I see a path here. Honda keeps on making Hybrid cars/CUVs. Nissan makes trucks, SUVs and electric cars. Maybe a joint sports car. All current Nissan cars and CUVs are ditched immediately. The designs for their CVT are sealed in lead and dropped in the Mariana Trench.

Last edited 1 month ago by JumboG
Ron888
Ron888
1 month ago

Honda and Nissan? There’s really nothing in it for Honda.All it would do is tarnish their image.
Yes it’s true Honda’s racing heritage is vastly overblown (on four wheels at least) but the point is lots of people still believe they’re something special.Honda cant afford many compromises and Nissan doesnt deserve charity.

Maryland J
Maryland J
1 month ago

Honda is looking for an EV partner, Nissan (who does have some EV experience with the Leaf, Aryia) is looking for a life raft. If the Chinese market was that important to their global sales strategy, Honda would have been better off doing what everyone except Tesla did, and get forcibly partnered with a Chinese firm.

Not that it would be all bad. At least EV technology is something China is very competitive with (government subsidies notwithstanding, but hey, we do it too. Tesla alone has benefited from 2-3 Billion dollars worth of consumer credits).

Really, I’m seeing this more as a domestically driven political issue. Japan has been more conservative leaning since Abe has been in office, and with China doing China things, will probably continue to drift in that direction. Why not tap into that national solidarity and join up with another Japanese firm? Toyota is already slowly eating Subaru.

Vic Vinegar
Vic Vinegar
1 month ago
Reply to  Maryland J

Or maybe Honda saw the writing on the wall. They could give away their expertise and designs to a Chinese company for a few years of sales before they get undercut in the Chinese market. Or they could just not do that.

Logan King
Logan King
1 month ago

What does Nissan provide to this partnership beyond a customer list of people with credit scores that look more like batting averages?

NosrednaNod
NosrednaNod
1 month ago

Not sure why combining with NISSAN would help Honda. Wouldn’t they be better off combining with someone who fills in their gaps? Nissan and Honda kind of play in the same space.

Dodsworth
Dodsworth
1 month ago

A Honda-Nissan merger? I can hear the Honda hissy fits now. A merger of equals until Honda cuts Nissan adrift.

Paint-Drinking Thundercock Harvey Park
Paint-Drinking Thundercock Harvey Park
1 month ago
Reply to  Dodsworth

The “Nissan” is silent.

Unlike Rogues. Those shitcans are so loud.

EXL500
EXL500
1 month ago

Honda already endured a relationship with British Leyland. Please do not inflict Nissan upon them. I’m too invested in my Honda love for that.

Manwich Sandwich
Manwich Sandwich
1 month ago

Could Honda-Nissan work?”

Maybe. But I would be concerned about Nissan dragging Honda down.

Urban Runabout
Urban Runabout
1 month ago

Came here to say this.

Captain Muppet
Captain Muppet
1 month ago

If Honda and Nissan merged then there would be just one single company disappointing me by not making a CRX, Silvia, S2000, Sileighty, NSX, Skyline GTR, 2-door Integra, 200 SX, RVF or any straight six engines.

I’ve owned 6 cars from those two companies, and the only one they make a current version of is the 350Z, but not in Europe, so what do I care?

P Hans
P Hans
1 month ago

The continual merger of large companies is the bane of capitalism. If left unchecked we will have one giga-corporation like “Buy N Large” that controls everything from cars to fertilizer to chicken nuggets to aircrafts. Yes, this is extreme, but capitalism has no limits against mergers. Left unchecked like the GOP intends to allow, these mergers are bound to happen and the merged company will outcompete any and all new entrants or more likely buy them and absorb their new innovative tech etc. while we fall closer and closer into total monopoly.
Nobody except the company owners, c-suite and shareholders benefit, all the rest suffer inferior product quality, reduced safety and lack of innovation. This isnt exactly new and groundbreaking information, yet article mentions only reasons for why this mergere is plausible and workable. Without counter viewpoints it resembles corporate news, not journalism.

Drive By Commenter
Drive By Commenter
1 month ago
Reply to  P Hans

You mean like Walmart and Amazon? A lot of brands basically exist because of selling to/on their sites.

Paint-Drinking Thundercock Harvey Park
Paint-Drinking Thundercock Harvey Park
1 month ago
Reply to  P Hans

That’s not really extreme. Those do-everything companies already exist, like Fuji, Mitsubishi, Samsung, and a few others.

Sbzr
Sbzr
1 month ago

But then you would have Honsan or Nisnda and that would be awful

SonOfLP500
SonOfLP500
1 month ago
Reply to  Sbzr

Hondatsun

Sbzr
Sbzr
1 month ago
Reply to  SonOfLP500

bless you

SonOfLP500
SonOfLP500
1 month ago
Reply to  Sbzr

Thank you. It’s the allergy season.

Stephen B
Stephen B
1 month ago

Lol, you can tell how people get their information second hand or from no experience. Yes, the early CVT’s were bad, but Nissan has done leaps and bounds to make it better. Their quality has gone up significantly for their CVT vehicles in at least the last 5 years. On top of that Nissan trucks and SUV’s are significantly more useful than whatever Honda makes. I can see good things coming from a merger like this as both companies will benefit from each other. They have a common goal, take down the Toyota fanboyism.

Logan King
Logan King
1 month ago
Reply to  Stephen B

The only truck Nissan sells in North America is a reskinned version of a vehicle from the first term of the Bush administration. Whether or not that compares favorably to the Honda Ridgeline is open to an interpretation over two different types of products which is ultimately irrelevant compared to the better trucks in the segment; but certainly I’d be interested to know how Nissan’s range of car based SUVs is any more useful than Honda’s range of car significantly newer car based SUVs.

More importantly, what “good thing” does Honda get from a merger with a car maker with so many very public struggles whose lineup revolves so heavily around cars so old that they’d win that competition against Stellantis products?

Last edited 1 month ago by Logan King
Shinynugget
Shinynugget
1 month ago

Yeah, please keep Honda away from Nissan’s hot garbage. There isn’t one single car they make that I would by save the Z. And even that is only if I had the money to burn on a 2nd fun only car.

Autopizen
Autopizen
1 month ago

With massive overseas sales, I think perhaps part of Toyota’s profit strength might be related to the yen’s weakness.

Are Honda & Nissan also doing relatively well this year?

121
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x