I was talking with a friend at Stellantis a while back, and they straight-up said they were looking forward to the next regime, whatever may come. With the surprise announcement from Stellantis that CEO Carlos Tavares is resigning, it’s time to consider what can be done to save the American brands of Chrysler, Jeep, Dodge, Eagle, and Ram. Well, maybe not Eagle.
And what of Europe? What should the rest of the brands (Fiat, Lancia, Alfa, Maserati, et cetera) do? I’ve got some thoughts about how new interim boss John Elkann can start to piece the company back together if that’s what he wants.
Why did Tavares leave? Yesterday, I didn’t have an answer, today it’s becoming a little clearer how the final moments played out in the Stellantis bunker somewhere in Amsterdam. It’ll give me a chance to review his term as CEO and make an offer to any other brand that might be interested in picking up his term.
Stellantis Should Move Its Headquarters To Detroit Or Drop North America All Together
When Fiat picked up the various Chrysler brands for a song, the newly merged Fiat Chrysler (FCA) made sure people knew and understood that it was still an American company. Reeling from two failed wars and an economy that was made out of soggy gingerbread, America in the late aughts could be a depressing place. The young company embraced the new administration’s message of hope and Detroit’s underdog spirit to create the “Imported from Detroit” campaign.
It worked. We believed Eminem when he said the vehicles would reflect American attitudes and tastes, even if the guy who ran the company was suddenly a chainsmoking, sweater-wearing Italian. In fact, then-CEO Sergio Marchionne was a constant fixture in North America who was largely liked and accepted by American journalists, execs, and employees.
Carlos Tavares never found that acceptance. A successful CEO in Europe, Tavares stayed mostly European. As head of Opel and Peugeot, Tavares was seen as a smart guy who saw the coming changes to the global car market and began to make the hard decisions necessary to keep those brands afloat long enough to eventually merge with FCA to create Stellantis.
In fairness to Tavares, this was Marchionne’s dream as well. Fiat always wanted to be a bigger global player, and Tavares realized Marchonne’s vision. Unfortunately, Tavares was never equipped to make the deal work. In his selection of managers, his reduction of engineering/product development in Michigan, and his constant bickering with suppliers/workers/governments, Tavares understood the potential of a combined global automaker but never quite understood what to do with it.
In the interim, market share in North America has taken a nosedive, and with it the profits needed to sustain the failing European operation (Stellantis lost a third of its share in Europe since Tavares took over, and Fiat is down by half to just 1.8% of Europe’s total market). Earlier this year I wrote that I didn’t think Stellantis, though coming off a profitable year, would be able to stick the landing. It clearly didn’t.
What can be done? I think Stellantis has two choices:
- Become a more American company
- Spin off the American brands
America needs a fourth major automaker, and Jeep is one of the strongest brands in the world, other than maybe Tesla or Ferrari. IF Stellantis wants to keep the American arm it needs to invest in making good products with American engineers, marketers, and designers. Tavares arrogantly assumed he could outsource much of the work to Europe, Brazil, and India.
In the impending Trump era, it’s clear that there’s going to be an industrial policy here that favors American production. Honestly, even if Harris had been elected, I think this was going to be the case. Rather than fight it, Stellantis needs to embrace it with vehicles and concepts that make the various brands fit within an American portfolio and not a ‘House of Brands’ that also includes Alfa, Fiat, and Maserati.
In fact, Fiat, Alfa, and Maserati have to leave North America. It was a fun experiment and it didn’t work. Oh well.
Dodge needs new products, badly, and it needs them to cover the entry-level of the market that the Korean and Japanese automakers are dominating. Ram needs to become a part of Dodge. While the Wagoneer and Wagoneer S can stay, Jeep needs to offer a fuller and better (newer!) range of crossovers on the lower/middle end of the market. Chrysler needs some flagships and, in fact, Chrysler should have been the EV brand all along while Pacifica should become the Dodge Grand Caravan again. That’s three brands, all distinct, that make sense. Make Ralph Gilles CEO. Easy. Done.
If Stellantis can’t do that, it should just let the American brands become a new company as it did with Ferrari. It worked out for Ferrari and it can work out for the newly re-minted Chrysler Corporation (with Ralph Gilles as CEO, just saying). It’s probably a bad time to become a public company, so I’m not sure how that’ll work, but perhaps there’s enough private capital out there to try.
What About The Rest Of The Brand?
John Elkann, pictured above with his brother Lapo and his sister Ginvera, is the Chair of Stellantis, CEO of Ferrari/Stellantis shareholder Exor. He’s also the grandson of famous Italian industrialist Gianni Agnelli and has long operated as the family leader following the death of his uncle.
He’s going to be running the company in the interim, and he’s going to have to help pick a leader with a vision for Stellantis. I’ve explained what I, a humble blogger, think needs to be done in North America. What about Europe?
Sell Peugeot and Citroën to Renault. Just get rid of it. It’ll make everyone happier and Renault has a hot hand right now. Sell Maserati to a Chinese automaker. Keep Alfa Romeo and let it be a sister brand to Ferrari so Ferrari dealers can get a car to its clients while its clients wait two years for a Ferrari. Fiat can be an Italian brand again, and one with eyes on cheaper cars in Europe and South America. OR, just sell that as well.
Honestly, the car business is an old business and you’ve already got Ferrari. What do you even want Fiat for? Let that be someone else’s problem.
Carlos Tavares Took The Money And Ran Away
Friends, readers, CJDR dealers, lend me your ears. I come to bury Stellantis CEO Carlos Tavares, not praise him. The capital expenditures men do live after them; the higher margin quarters often interred with their bones. So let it be with Carlos.
Tavares, not pictured above, is an interesting character. His reputation coming into the Stellantis deal was stellar. As longtime auto exec Dr. Andy Palmer put it, “Carlos is perhaps the most professional car guy I’ve worked with. He’s created some of the most iconic cars, including the Renault Megane series. That Stellantis exists at all is all down to Carlos.” He also added that Carlos is also a “bloody good driver.”
Other than Elon Musk, Carlos Tavares is probably the highest-paid automotive CEO in the world, having made about $40 million in 2023. He did it by driving margins up on cars in America by squeezing out the same old products at a much higher price to consumers who didn’t have much of a choice. It worked until it didn’t and, unlike his former boss Carlos Ghosn, it seems like Tavares is going to get out with the money. His reputation? That’s another story and seems related to why Tavares left.
Here’s what Reuters is reporting, though I haven’t heard the Tavares side of it yet:
A source familiar with the matter told Reuters that tensions grew after the board felt Tavares was moving too quickly and focusing on near-term solutions to save his reputation, not working in the best interests of the company.
The sudden announcement on Sunday indicated that the fissures between the board and Tavares had to be severe, given that the parties decided it was better to operate with no CEO on a short-term basis, Bernstein analysts said.
Yikes. Once the company announced it wasn’t going to pick up the Tavares contract it didn’t really make sense to keep him on as his motivations would be either to make as much money as possible or, as indicated above, try to make himself look better.
Here’s the kicker on that article, by the way:
“Tavares is leaving behind a mess of painful layoffs and overpriced vehicles sitting on dealership lots,” UAW President Shawn Fain said in a statement.
Double yikes.
Someone, Please Hire Carlos Tavares
I’ve been doing this bit with Carlos Tavares, pictured above, since at least February. The basic premise of the joke is that the actor Jon Lovitz tends to play characters who are always willing to say or do anything to get an advantage over other people.
I truly enjoy this bit and would like to see it continue. I also think Tavares blundered this, but he does have a great history and loves old cars.
So here’s my deal: If you’re a struggling automaker, an upstart firm, or any other carmaker in need of a CEO, please hire Carlos. If only to keep this joke going I will write more about KTM or Polestar or whatever way more than I would if you hired some normal MBA exec person.
What I’m Listening To While Writing TMD
With a shoutout to SWG, here’s a little Paul Simon from the excellent “Graceland” doing “Diamonds on the Soles of her Shoes.”
The Big Question
Do you also agree that Ralph Gilles should take over Stellantis? If not Ralph, then who would you pick?
All the US brands pair with an EV company to immediately solve that gap in product. Go Big. Go Tesla.
Ralph should not be given the reigns.
He’s a phenomenal car designer, but do you remember the time he ran Dodge and then SRT? Yeah, most don’t. He was CEO of Dodge for a year, SRT for 4. Dodge already had its own plans when got in, and he didn’t decide anything after. Under SRT, all the development money he would’ve gotten went to Alfa and Maserati, leaving the SRT idea DOA. Ralph didn’t even do bad; he just didn’t do anything much. He’s a car designer at heart, and he’s great at it, so he should stay right where he’s the most comfortable and valuable.
It doesn’t matter who runs CDJR if it’s ran by some company like just another Buick, Acura, GMC, Lincoln…. brands who just do what they’re told, no questions asked.
CDJR needs to be more Ferrari or Audi. Let the company dictate what they build and make more their market and fund them for it. If they commit to it, then the CEO they chose is important. And if that’s the case, see if you give those reigns to Tim K. I’m sure being given autonomy to build up CDJR with a massive budget would be very inciting to a guy like him. If not, then the search gets more interesting.
The Italian makers can stay, but they need to reinvent the dealership experience. My local Alfa/Maserati dealership looks like it’s shut, even with cars inside and out. It’s attached to a BMW/Mini dealership and you’d think that it was owned by 2 different companies. It’s the same thing with my local CDJR dealer having a Fiat wing. It’s been dead for some time, but even when there was 3 500’s and the 124, you wouldn’t have even known they sold them.
Everyone has an idea on how to save Stellantis, but I think the easiest way to save them in the US is to consolidate and create a Ford or GM style Hierarchy.
Make Dodge the low man brand, for everyone. Offer competitive SUV’s and sporty cars that people can drive reliably and get a good deal on to undercut Ford and GM.
Make Chrysler the “Buick” of Stellantis. Offer the Dodge models with more standard options, features, and “luxury” to the person who wants to move up from a Dodge after getting a management position at the bank.
Make either Maserati or Alfa Romeo the “Cadillac” of Stellantis. Offer the highest trim features and sporty SUV’s and cars. Can’t have them both, so look at which brand sells best and holds the most value with buyers. Take the lower brand cars, slap a Trident on it and make it different enough that the average shmuck thinks he’s buying a piece of “Italia” when he gets into his SUV.
Make Jeep the “GMC” of Stellantis. Offer the off-road lifestyle in both raw and rugged along with luxury and comfort. Make the Wagoneer the preferred choice over the Suburban/Yukon buy selling the off-road life in packages (think the AT4 trim on the Yukon) and badge engineer those other SUV’s with Jeep logos. Trail Rated badges still mean something to people that love the Jeep brand.
Last but not least, we have Ram. At this point, just keep Ram as Ram. Maybe sell a version of the Wagoneer as a Ram and focus on building fun, reliable, and usable pickup trucks. Make a Colorado/Ranger competitor and give Ford a run for it’s money with a Maverick competitor that offers better looks and “utility” even if it doesn’t.
They’ll need to get the dealers on board, and those poor bastards have been put over the barrel the last 20 years. I don’t know how much longer they can show enthusiasm and get behind the brand when the management has cut them off from any real profitiablity at this point. Any plan will take billions, and that investment isn’t guaranteed as the future of the automotive landscape keeps changing.
I’d agree that Stellantis might be better to spin off the brands, but what legs would a buyer have to stand on? What value do you get from cutting off the development arms from Stellantis’s resources? CJDR will still sell, they’ll still make some profit, but eventually they’ll get left behind unless someone starts making decisions that prioritize their most profitable market and making what the market wants.
the dealers are pieces of shit, too, but otherwise, this is a magical post
I hear Tim Kuniskis isn’t doing anything…also that would be an epic FU to Mr. (pictured above) on his way out the door.
I love Ralph Gilles as much as the next Autopian, but honestly I’d like him to keep building unreasonably cool cars and not have to deal with the mundane crap that the CEO would have to. Not saying I’m opposed to the idea, but I’m kind of split on whether that would be a good fit.
as a CFO, maybe, but his tenure as CEO has been a remarkable failure. From what I understand, the highlights of his career are when he was CFO at Renault and massive cost-cutting at PSA, which is a very CFO-like thing to do. However, it increasingly looks like his tenure as CEO has been a comedy of ruinous short-term thinking. Almost everything he got praised for early on has backfired spectacularly.
Oh good, this again..
Fiat, Alfa, and Maserati don’t have to leave. I’m not sure why that’s always the answer; like their presence is keeping the Chrysler brand on life support and them going away will allow Chrysler to make a full recovery. They can co-exist. Fiat, Alfa, and Maserati need more competitive products that appeal to Americans at reasonable prices. I mean Hyundai-Kia built an empire from nearly nothing, gobbling up significant market share while introducing yet another luxury brand into a crowded market with decent success. Mazda successfully changed their branding and image from fun zoom-zoom to upscale. There’s no reason why Fiat, Alfa, and Maserati can’t do something similar, but they need a team that is more competent in that arena than what they have had.
That said, I don’t hate the ideas under the ‘What About the Rest of the Brands?’ heading.
P.S.: Keep the Wagoneer? Can they at least make it look like a Wagoneer and not have it be a Plan C for Escalade and Navigator buyers?
Being “Plan C” is kind of CDJR’s whole thing.
Username is on point for this discussion, though it does make me doubt your objectivity. 😉