One of the most recognizable buses in American history is the GMC PD-4501 Scenicruiser. Even if you don’t know the name of this bus, you’ve almost certainly seen a picture of one online or perhaps even seen one in person. If you’re old enough, there’s a high chance you’ve even taken one of these great buses between cities. Now, the very first production Scenicruiser built is for sale and the seller wants a staggering $650,000 for it. I’m probably crazy for saying this, but that might actually be a decent price for this piece of American bus and General Motors history.
The Scenicruiser currently for sale on Facebook of all places is PD-4501-001. This bus is the very first production example of the Scenicruiser built in 1954. These buses would serve Greyhound Lines for years before their retirement. Just 1,001 units were built in the mid-1950s, of which only about 220 are known to exist today.
You’d think, then, that the very first Scenicruiser would be in Greyhound’s fleet or maybe somewhere at General Motors. Of all of the Scenicruisers built, just this one has stayed in Greyhound’s hands for its entire existence. Most recently, it was a part of the Greyhound Historic Collection. Sadly, Greyhound began parting ways with the collection in 2022 after the bus line was acquired by Munich-based FlixBus and its former owner, British transport conglomerate FirstGroup, sold off its Greyhound assets to Twenty Lake Management LLC.
Tons of Greyhound assets, including whole depots, were put on the chopping block. Not often reported was the disbandment of the Greyhound Historic Collection. Some buses have been sent to museums while PD-4501-001 remains in limbo. In November 2022, its listing price was a mouth-watering $950,000. Now, it’s still for sale for $650,000. It’s a shame because this bus marks an important part in both Greyhound and GMC history.
A Real Piece Of History
The Scenicruiser was one of the wonderful creations of General Motors back when it dominated all things diesel. From my retrospective:
Yellow Coach Manufacturing Company was opened in 1923 in Chicago by John D. Hertz. If that name sounds familiar, in 1923, Hertz bought out the Rent-A-Car rental company and changed its name to Hertz Drive-Ur-Self, which is today known simply as Hertz. That was hardly Hertz’s only business. In 1915, Hertz started the Yellow Cab Company in Chicago and also in 1923, Hertz started the Yellow Coach Manufacturing Company as a subsidiary of Yellow Cab. The coach arm of the business was responsible for the manufacture of buses. General Motors purchased a majority stake in the business just two years after its opening.
At the time, most buses were built with a body-on-frame design. One of Yellow Coach’s innovations back then was a monocoque structure. It started in 1936 with the Model 719 highway bus, which featured a transversely-mounted diesel engine in the rear and an aluminum monocoque construction. In 1940, the bus that would become the Old Look would get the same technology. When the GMC Truck and Coach Division absorbed the rest of Yellow Coach in 1943, this basic design layout would continue to see use in the rest of GM’s bus legends. For example, my RTS bus was built out of five-foot sections of stainless steel unibody.
The engineering might of General Motors was unrivaled. Someone alive in the 1970s could have ridden between stops in a GMC New Look city bus, gotten between cities in a GMC PD-4501 Scenicruiser bus, and traveled across the country on a train pulled by an Electro-Motive Division SDP40F in Amtrak livery. GM built just about everything that moved but large commercial airliners.
This story takes us back to the roaring period immediately after World War II. Bus travel was still a preferred way to traverse much of the United States. While planes were getting more popular, buses were still seen as the method for most people to travel long distances. In 1947, Look magazine reported that bus travel was the fastest-growing form of transportation in America, so it was crucial for bus lines and bus builders to put buses on the road that people wanted to ride in.
As Curbside Classic notes, from 1940 until well after the war, the PD-3751 “Silversides” was the bus of choice for Greyhound. The PD-3751 took the monocoque construction pioneered by Yellow Coach and paired it with reliable Detroit Diesel power. At the time, only GM buses had Detroit Diesels, which meant they had a huge advantage in both coach design and power.
There was a time when Greyhound was such a huge name in the bus line market that it had the pull to demand designs from bus manufacturers, not unlike how airlines buddy up with aircraft manufacturers. In 1944, Greyhound announced that it had begun development of a 50-passenger bus that was the same length and width as its existing buses, but managed to fit 9 extra passengers by going to a double-decker layout. This new bus would have carried more passengers without violating regulations on the length of intercity buses.
A patent was filed and in 1945, the Consolidated Vultee Aircraft Corporation (Convair) and General Motors were both given contracts to build prototypes of the new bus. Unfortunately, both companies would drop out of their contracts just a year later, forcing Greyhound to do it alone. As Motor Trend notes, the styling of Greyhound’s new bus would be handled by the famed Raymond Loewy. His designs reflected the optimism of the era with large windows, sleek aerodynamics, and intricate details in metal. The gorgeous behemoth, which could have been perhaps the prettiest bus ever built, was dubbed the “Highway Traveler.”
The first Highway Traveler prototype, the GX-1, was built by Greyhound’s own engineers. This 35-foot bus had room for 37 people on the upper deck and 13 people down below. The configuration allowed Greyhound to stay within state length restrictions while adding passengers.
The GX-1 presented Greyhound with a number of challenges. A double-decker all-metal bus is heavy, which meant that Greyhound needed a substantial engine. Greyhound found that Detroit Diesel didn’t make an engine that was powerful enough. Hall-Scott made an engine with enough beef to move the massive bus, but it consumed fuel at epic rates, so Greyhound landed on a weird idea: The line would power its bus with two air-cooled V6 engines from the Aircooled Motors Co., the same engine supplier that gave the Tucker 48 its distinctive engine. As Curbside Classic notes, Greyhound figured that the bus would run on one engine most of the time, but fire up the second engine for high loads like hills.
The GX-1 was put into revenue service for testing, but the bus would eventually return home and end up forgotten. Greyhound’s next iteration came with more help from General Motors. The General sent a 35-foot PD-4151 over to Greyhound, where Loewy worked his magic and Greyhound’s engineers modified the GM bus to their specifications.
In 1948, what they ended up with was the GX-2. This time, the resulting bus was a 40-foot beast with two rear axles. The GX-2 wasn’t a true double-decker. Instead, Greyhound borrowed a concept used by multiple bus builders before it. The forward compartment held 10 seats and a restroom while the raised compartment had seating for 33. Raising the bus behind the front end meant the bus could carry lots of luggage and perhaps even packages, making each trip potentially more lucrative.
The GX-2 was a headache for Greyhound. Length restrictions were still in place, so Greyhound spent years lobbying states to allow for its longer bus. At the same time, this bus didn’t solve the problem of needing a lot of power. An empty GX-2 weighed 26,100 pounds and tipped the scales at 34,485 pounds when loaded. This time, power would come from a 7-liter Detroit Diesel 6-71 straight-six. This engine made all of 200 HP and GM tried to give the engine help in the form of a porting job, cams, and even derestricting the engine’s RPM, but it was clear one engine just wasn’t going to cut it.
The Scenicruiser
The bus, called the Scenicruiser, was punted to GM to finalize and its engineers came up with the PD-4501. The Scenicruiser borrowed a lot of its technology from the PD-4104, which came a year before. The new bus had a smooth air suspension, aluminum panels over a monocoque construction, large windows, a fresh design, and Detroit Diesel power. Its upper deck allowed most passengers a wide view of the open road ahead while the massive baggage compartment promised additional fortunes.
However, unlike the PD-4104, the PD-4501 got really weird in the engine bay. See, a PD-4501 weighs about 29,000 pounds empty, towers 11 feet high, and these buses were built in 1954 before the advent of the relatively compact and strong diesels that buses have today. How did GM get around that? The company took two of its 4.7-liter Detroit Diesel 4-71 straight-fours and plopped them into the engine bay.
These engines were mounted side by side longitudinally and connected via a fluid coupling that was controlled by a solenoid-operated clutch. The driver shifted a three-speed transmission with a two-speed auxiliary transmission, giving a total of six gears. Greyhound says these engines power the rearmost axle and together pump out 300 HP. Torque should have been somewhere in the ballpark of 800 lb-ft. Starting was interesting as just one of the engines had a starter. Once one engine started, the other would start through the fluid coupling.
Greyhound touted the double-engine setup as not only a great source of power, but also redundancy. The bus was engineered to run on just one of the engines, so if one failed it wasn’t the end of the world. A Scenicruiser would just carry the dead engine to the next shop, get a new engine, and get back on the road. Greyhound made sure to stock engines along Scenicruiser routes just for that purpose. A special dolly was created with the idea of allowing Greyhound shops to quickly swap engines and accessories quickly. Quick-disconnect couplings were deployed all over the engine bay to make these swaps faster.
While the Scenicruiser quickly became a transit icon, it was a headache for Greyhound and General Motors. The innovative drivetrain setup wasn’t reliable and so many buses ended up broken and sidelined that the Scenicruiser availability rate cratered. As Curbside Classic notes, Greyhound got so desperate for reliable Scenicruisers that it sent a bus to Mercedes-Benz in Europe in hopes that maybe the Germans had a solution.
It should also be noted that, according to Bus Conversion Magazine, losing an engine also wasn’t a particularly good experience. The right engine controlled the air-conditioner, so if you lost that you’d have to drive a 160 HP sweatbox. The left engine controlled power steering, so if you lost that engine you’d be sweating in an air-conditioned 160 HP box. Oh, and you had to seal the exhaust of the dead engine because if you didn’t, the roots blower of the living engine could pull debris into the dead engine, killing it even further.
Unreliability wasn’t the only problem, either, as the PD-4501s also sometimes suffered from structure cracks. This would be a problem to impact later GM buses, too, like RTS-II engine cradles.
Eventually, Greyhound had enough and had a public spat with General Motors. It ordered 1,000 Scenicruisers and got 1,001 examples after the last prototype, EXP-331, was converted to PD-4501 spec and given serial number 1001. Greyhound stopped there, which meant that Scenicruiser production ended in 1956. General Motors also faced an anti-trust lawsuit and that year, the manufacturer’s monopoly on Detroit Diesel engines ended. Now, competing buses could get DD power, too.
Greyhound would later throw its money all-in on Motor Coach Industries (MCI), never looking back. But while it still had GM coaches Greyhound would invest in upgrades. In 1959, Detroit Diesel launched the 8V-71, a 9.3-liter V8 diesel that made 318 HP right out of the box, or more power than the Scenicruisers had from two 4-71s. Greyhound passed $10 million to Marmon-Harrington to upgrade the Scenicruiser fleet. The twin-engine complicated drivetrain was thrown away. Each bus was repowered with a Detroit 8V-71 and a more conventional four-speed manual transmission, solving the power issues once and for all.
Despite their problems, the Scenicruisers were beloved by riders for their comfort, their unforgettable style, and the views out of those large windows. Greyhound’s competitors buddied up with other bus manufacturers to make buses with similar specs and looks as the Scenicruisers, but none of them would gain the fame as the Scenicruiser.
Greyhound began phasing out the Scenicruisers in the early 1970s and by 1978, just a few were still in the Greyhound fleet. The bus line didn’t like the idea of selling these buses second-hand to its competition, so it tried to sell the old Scenicruisers to bus lines outside of America. Greyhound got few bites, which meant that most of these buses eventually met the crusher.
The influence of the Scenicruiser was also a big one. Larger 40-foot buses became more popular and riders craved large windows with tons of visibility. While the Scenicruiser and its competition eventually became old news, those old enough to have ridden on these buses still have fond memories of them. Greyhound was proud enough of the Scenicruiser to keep the very first production example for all of these years. The bus has gone to meetups and shows, providing perhaps more smiles than many other historic coaches out there.
This bus, fleet number 1954, is an interesting one. It is the very first bus off of the production line, but it technically isn’t the first Scenicruiser. The EXP-331 prototype, which is owned by Tom McNally, was built earlier, but it wasn’t converted to production spec until 1956. So that bus is technically both the first and the last.
Anyway, this bus is serial 001, or the very first of regular production, and it’s a time capsule in every sense of the term. Greyhound has kept this bus in pristine condition and it has been through at least one restoration. I’m not sure you’ll find a more authentic Scenicruiser in existence. Power comes from a Detroit Diesel 8V-71 and is shifted through a four-speed manual, so you don’t have to deal with the wacky dual-engine setup, either.
Honestly, this bus should probably go to a museum, but it’s been for sale for nearly two years and sadly, its future is still in limbo. The bus is currently for sale on Facebook by Michaud Bus Services in Los Angeles, California. for the whopping price of $650,000. I want to say the price is almost worth it, maybe?
It’s the very first production Scenicruiser and probably the best one that you’ll find in existence. But then the entirety of its value will be in the fact that it’s a cream puff museum piece and a great part of transit history. Turning it into an RV wouldn’t be the right thing to do, so you’d be spending $650,000 just to display the bus somewhere. So, I’m not really sure. What I can say is that I’m in love and I wish I could take it for a drive.
(Hat tip: homestarrunner.net: it’s dot com on our Discord!)
- Here’s How Some Auto Parts Stores Have Stayed Alive In The Online Era: COTD
- What’s The Most Autopian Car You’ve Ever Owned Or Experienced?
- Matt And David’s Never-ending Battle Over Tone – Tales From The Slack
- BMW Once Shoved A Turbocharged Straight-Six Into Its Smallest Crossover And It’s Now Dirt Cheap Speed
The Autopian needs a touring bus, does it not?
Or this one for one thirteenth the price!
https://palmsprings.craigslist.org/cto/d/nampa-up-for-adoption-my-greyhound/7780422044.html
Mercedes, you know you need this, you can probably afford it,!
Or at least do a “You can buy a scenicruiser for half the price of an ID buzz”
You know you want it.
Oh, I just reread the ad, and apparently it’s free to the right person if you can convince the owner that you’re the right person.
And who could be more right than you Mercedes??
OH NO! The ad says it’s expired!
It still loads for me
Here is his YouTube channel
https://www.youtube.com/@augustalan3528
Oh my, he’s into ford 8n tractors and exotic movie projectors too.
You need to screen capture the ad before it vanishes from your computer’s cache, then post it on imgur.com. Sadly, I also see “expired” on the link.
Hmm, apparently on the iPhone safari when set to “reader view” and with JavaScript turned off (kills obnoxious adds on a site I visit) you can see some expired Craig’s list ads.
The send message link throws an error though
Anyway, I sent mercedes@TheAutopian.com screenshots and the YouTube channel probably will help
The sellers mom went to high school Ed ‘Big Daddy’ Roth!
Ill never look at vintage busses the same way again. Ill have to see what the difference between this one and the one at the AACA musuem. Here’s hoping the GM heritage collection, AACA, Greyhound or the New Pontiac Musuem in Pontiac Michigan take a look at this bus.
Mercedes, I still want to know why some ENC buses have two different exhaust pipes coming out of the back. Are they dual motor too?
Oh snap, I forgot about that question! I’ll put that on my docket. 🙂
Thank you! I go through Route 60/Town Line and St Mary’s about the same time every day and almost without fail I see one every workday. I have tried to research it myself because I find it fascinating, but had zero luck. I’ve even called both ENC and Pace but no shit, got treated like I was a terrorist doing planning. Perhaps your skills will do the trick. I must know!
Obviously the forerunner of the General Motors, Oldsmobile Vista Cruiser.
A beautiful bus. My tinkering brain of course was thinking about how to use a modern engine in place, and then I started thinking about how different engines are now. It is crazy to me how far engines have come. A single 6.7 Ford Power Stroke diesel could now easily power this bus, plus save a lot of weight.
For somebody with serious money to burn, this would be so perfect with a modern repower and use as a tailgate rig at car races, ball games, etc. I mean SEC football fans have their own rail car for that purpose, and this is so much cooler.
Yeah, a Powerstroke would shed ~1300lb, and gain ~150hp. But this 8v71 will have no issues toting this bus around in modern traffic, 300hp of two stroke Detroit is a lot.
No, what it needs is a transmission upgrade and to keep the Detroit. That four speed has gotta be majorly holding this back, ten or so gears would do nicely.
Anyways, I’m guessing you have never experienced a two stroke Detroit in person, or you would never even consider taking it out.
Not that I am aware of! But if the transmission is the weak link, then go with that route!
I think this belongs at the Peterson or the American Driving Museum in El Segundo:
https://automobiledrivingmuseum.org/
The bus is great and I hope some museum gets it. If one of the automotive museums wants to solicit donations toward getting it, I’ll chip in.
And the username who suggested it references my favorite Homestar bit, which is always fun.
G’Damnnnn that is one gorgeous bus. Thanks for the article, didn’t know these existed
the bus kinda reminds me of a reverse 747 without wings
It sure is pretty. I don’t want to drive it. I would be too scared. But I just want to sit in the driver seat, start it, maybe go forward 50 feet. and push all the buttons. its a thing of beauty.
This bus suffers from what I refer to as “The Billy Beer Problem.” Billy Beer was made as a blatant cash grab by Jimmy Carter’s ne’er do well brother. The beer was terrible, but that wasn’t the point of the exercise – it was supposed to be a Collectible.
Now you can still get unopened cans of Billy Beer today and they would be worth a lot of money to the right person, but there just aren’t very many ‘right persons’.
The same, sadly, for this bus. The overlap in the Venn diagram of people who want it, and who can afford it is apparently too small.
I rode in a Scenicruiser in my teen years. The upper deck was a very quiet and comfortable place to be.
There’s one of these wedged into the back corner of a lot across from a supply house I frequent. I wanted to walk over & take a look, but the counter guy warned me that the owner is tired of people wanting to gawk at it and wouldn’t be nice about it.
At perhaps age 12 I rode a Scenicruiser from Napa CA into San Francisco but it was at nighttime so the view didn’t count for much. I recall walking the aisle to the rear, it smelled bad and was crowded with people who left their stuff where it had to be climbed over then grumbled at me for doing it. The side-to-side swaying was worse up there, Mom said it would be, but standing at the top of the very-steep stairs in front of the second windshield was neat and I stayed for a minute or so ’til I got griped at. I wound up riding up front, the driver talked the whole time and made maybe three stops along the highway to pick up and drop off people he apparently knew, no tickets. I actually asked about the baggage compartment being full of boxes and was told it was a side business. Mom liked busses, I had probably ten thousand miles in them by the time I was 18 but not many more since.
The side business: Greyhound Package Express.
The first Matchbox I bought was a Scenicruiser, in 1969 or so.
I’m curious why they originally used such a complex engine setup, when the 6046 tank engine was right there on the shelf. Granted two 6-71 engines on common crankcase was a bit much but the U12 was very reliable. A scaled down U8 would have been less complex than the fluid coupling. The 8V-71 was the right answer though, it just took time.
This is historically significant but I think it’s still overpriced.
There is one of these I see on a regular basis sitting on the street in Lowell AZ (aka Bisbee) cool looking bus but I wouldn’t want it if it was free
What street in Bisbee? I’d like to see one in person
Its 21 Erie street down the road from Bisbee Breakfast Club, its an old Greyhound Depot, if you google map it the bus is pictured. its not on the street view though for whatever reason. Its been awhile since I have been there so I hope its still there.
Weirdly enough – if you go down street view to 19 Erie Street and look back at 21 – Google grabs an March 2021 without the tractor trailer parked there which was 2016: https://maps.app.goo.gl/xh8LQPDrtbtUpz7z6
Its a great street to walk down in general if you want to go back in time a bit, they have all the old storefronts up and cars from the 50s just lined up like its a museum but its just a random street in a small town in the middle of nowhere
@ Bob Terwilliger, yep it’s still there, we had breakfast at the BBC last week.
cool, yeah I cant imagine anyone moving it and it doesn’t look drive-able, but I haven’t been down that road in a bit, we use BBC as a place to take visiting family and its been a bit
There’s also a 1948 International pickup off the street, much like the one our family used to haul a tandem axle moving trailer when we relocated from Albuquerque to the central coast of California. Pops drove that and Mom had the ’56 Studebaker wagon. That was 1962.
The cornbinder had the 4 speed crash box that you had to double clutch going up and down..I can still tell that tranny blindfolded.
Aaaand the batwing ’59 Chevy parked across the street has bullet holes in it????
These are cool, but I’ll stick with my Matchbox version. It is much cheaper to maintain and store.
It belongs in a museum!
(I know you said that in the article, I just wanted to be the one to say it in the comments.)
“So do you, Doctor Jones!”
I can practically feel the wanna-buy-it- jitters Mercedes has writing this article.
I can just hear her trying to justify the purchase to Sheryl:
“Babe, it’s a total bargain! They marked it down, like, 30%! I’d be an idiot NOT to buy it!
Babe?
Babe? Sweetie?”
I rode cross-country (well, Detroit to L.A.) in a Scenicruiser, many, many, many years ago. It wasn’t the worst ride I’ve ever had, but it sure was long. Riding is one thing, driving is another. I don’t think I’d bid, even if my garage was large enough to hold it.
The people, however, were a different story. I guess after three-four days on the road, you can’t expect people not to get a little gamy.
But the compensation was that you got a unique view of this country, one I’ve never enjoyed since. Sore muscles and olfactory memories fade, but the visual experience remains unforgettable.
Heckuva good piece of writing, Mercedes!
I mean, I’d take passengers over bus stop food, even if they are a bit gamey.
Considering that GM Futurliners are worth around a million bucks, and only hold 2-3 people, this is a bargain for seats/price ratio.
How many cars will a Scenicruiser hold?
It takes a special kind of person to look at this bus and think it’s worth that kind of money.
But then, here I am reading about it and daydreaming, so maybe I should keep my trap shut.