If you’re an American with a need to comfortably haul a house and still return decent fuel economy, one of the Big Three’s monumental diesel pickup trucks will almost certainly be on your shortlist. But where did this begin? Where did the seeds of America’s obsession with big trucks get planted? For that, you want to flip your calendars back about 65 years, when both Dodge and International briefly brought the power and fuel economy advantages of large trucks down into the light truck market. Without them, the course of diesel truck history might have looked different.
I’ve been pretty obsessed with diesel for quite a few years now. When Rudolf Diesel invented the effective diesel engine, he saw his engine not only leaving steam behind but helping the world become a utopia. As researcher Jean-Baptiste Fressoz wrote, in Rudolf’s eye, his simple, powerful, and easy-to-maintain engines would arm the denizens of rural lands with the ability to industrialize on their own, keeping power in the hands of the people rather than large corporations.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a95e3/a95e3e8a1588f8a61f742300c91e8bf3503600ef" alt="Vidframe Min Top"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03f84/03f84c33fdf7d1fa2515609fa05d43d2a4c65084" alt="Vidframe Min Bottom"
Ironically, the same traits of the diesel engine that Rudolf thought would be great for the regular person turned out to change the world in a way that Rudolf did not intend. Diesel is the driving force behind so much of the world’s development, from construction equipment to power generation and ships. If you’ve purchased a product before, there’s a very good chance that at some point before it got into your hands it rode on a train, aboard a ship, or in a truck pulled with a mighty diesel engine. If you eat produce, there’s a chance it was farmed with the aid of a machine fueled by diesel. The world has effectively been made smaller in part thanks to diesel technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a674f/a674f90b8ea6559578a618d63defb5f684e8fe4f" alt="469134737 10160259142846396 5762"
Of course, diesel technology has also trickled down to the consumer level. You can buy diesel heaters for your RV, diesel generators, or even small diesel engines to power a minibike if you were silly enough. Before the harsh and dirty realities unveiled by Dieselgate, the diesel engine was practically the default option for passenger vehicles in Europe. If you want the absolute maximum pulling power and fuel economy mix out of a pickup truck, diesel remains king for many buyers.
But it wasn’t always this way. For a time, if you wanted a light-duty pickup truck you were getting it with a gas engine. Then, America’s truck producers began some experiments.
America Goes Diesel
When most people talk about or write about diesel truck history, they start in the 1970s when automakers looked to diesel as a cheat code out of the high fuel prices and strained economies of the era. However, America’s curiosity about diesel trucks began long before that.
Diesels first landed in America in 1911 when Busch-Sulzer began selling engines in our country. Two years later, Alexander Winton’s Winton Engine Company became the first manufacturer to build diesels in America. But those engines found homes in equipment rather than road vehicles.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db856/db8560dc07e985cea77bd0520d712eaf6204d205" alt="Die Weltweit Ersten Diesel Lkw Von Benz Und Daimler Im Jahr 1923 The World's First Ever Diesel Trucks From Benz And Daimler In 1923"
Daimler claims to have built the world’s first diesel truck in 1923. Clessie Cummins had his own achievement to brag about in 1929 when he fitted a 1925 Packard limousine with his diesel engine. That car would prove the appeal of diesel through fuel-sipping road trips. Later, a Cummins-powered racecar ran the 1931 Indianapolis 500 without having to stop for fuel. The Cummins Packard is still often regarded as the first American diesel car.
You’ll note that none of these vehicles were production cars or trucks that you could buy from a dealer. Cummins did put some diesel engines in some trucks and buses, but those were largely used as demonstrators. The first production diesel truck, Curbside Classic writes, might have been the Cummins-powered trucks offered by Kenworth in 1933. Those trucks also had the sweet vertical stacks that truckers adore today.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83a23/83a232646883d3f2f08a2b9255f91234eb233f25" alt="Kenworth 1933 Diesel Truck"
Take a look at the beauty above!
The pickup truck, which was still in its infancy back then, would have to wait longer. There’s one truck that is commonly reported to be the very first production diesel light truck in America, but there is a more obscure truck that likely came just a little sooner.
America’s First Light-Duty Pickup Trucks
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c11b/1c11b06ab744f01eef0826be3007db1e2f3e7a0f" alt=""
Let’s start with the truck that is commonly reported to be the first production light-duty diesel pickup truck. As Diesel World Magazine writes, International Harvester noticed an interesting trend in the mid-1950s. The company’s Motor Truck Sales Department took note that there was a growing interest in diesel power in smaller trucks, first with medium-duty trucks. This sent International Harvester looking into what it could put diesel power into.
Coincidentally, Diesel World writes, the company’s Construction Equipment Division in Illinois was working on a new generation of diesel engines. The Construction Equipment Division figured it could take the architecture of IH’s existing Black Diamond post-World War II gasoline six-cylinder engines and use it as the backbone of compact diesel engines that IH could use throughout its portfolio. Sweetening the deal was that basing the new diesels on this architecture (which featured sixes ranging from 220 cubic inches to 264 cubic inches) meant that IH could use the same tooling, saving money.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4d4a/c4d4af6d5333ba70ff107684914803694fff9e50" alt="Metro Brochure Engine Page"
IH engineers used this architecture to create a slew of diesel engines, starting first in 1958 with the D236 and D282 sixes, which were bolted into tractors and construction equipment. Later, a turbocharged DT282 six was used in crawler tractors and high-altitude applications. Other diesels from this program included the D252 and D301 sixes as well as D188 and D201 fours. Power outputs varied based on application. However, a D301 in a truck was rated at 112.5 HP.
The IH Motor Truck Sales Department got what it wanted. Beginning in 1958, IH began outfitting medium-duty trucks with these engines, including the B-160 and BC-160. The first couple of hundred engines were sold to select customers and only a handful went overseas. By 1960, the compact diesel engine line was announced for production in medium-duty IH trucks. These engines would also become the smaller diesel options for the famed Loadstar line as well.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6fc3e/6fc3ea764064d7ab519054923a8ca7cbd69b145e" alt="472337103 10160335869531396 5209"
While all of this was happening, IH was gearing up for its next generation of light-duty pickups. The C-Line was designed to bring more carlike comforts to the working truck experience. IH was working on trucks with splashes of chrome, fake wood on the dash, vinyl floormats, sun visors, armrests, and a dome light. Plunking down more money got you carpet and padded door cards. Well, these were still trucks, after all, but nicer trucks.
Filling in the lineup alongside the C-Line was the Scout, the Travelall, and the Travelette. In 1959, IH was finalizing what it wanted in the C-Line when it decided to test its new diesel engines in the light trucks. IH found out that it didn’t take much to make the light trucks diesel. Pretty much the biggest change seen by a driver was the addition of a glow plug button. IH seemed pretty satisfied with the truck, as did its Foreign Operations unit. However, by 1961 IH determined that there wasn’t enough demand in the light truck market for a diesel.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66b83/66b83b59a13ad2ab1b5f875f0567a0e981a76ef1" alt="1968 International Harvester 120"
However, IH didn’t give up on diesel. The C-Line was launched in 1960 for the 1961 model year. It’s believed that a test mule was built in 1962. There was also an unknown number of diesel-powered Travelalls sold in Scandinavia in 1963. American buyers were able to buy a production C-Line truck with a D301 diesel six between 1963 and 1968. Sadly, since IH wasn’t confident in the diesel market it never put the diesel in official literature. Instead, the diesel engine was a secret menu item that you had to know about in order to buy.
For example, click here for the brochure for IH’s 1963 light-duty trucks where you’ll find diesel isn’t mentioned at all.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cac29/cac29ee31e14c0f77ea2b6c4ae10aeba0cf12065" alt="469024762 10160259142246396 7158"
Because of this, it’s not known just how many IH C-Line trucks were sold with a D301. It’s believed that as few as 19 were built in 1968. The highest known engine number is 8070, but that just means how many D301s were built by that point in 1968, not how many light-duty trucks were built. Either way, we aren’t talking huge numbers here.
As far as naming goes, IH C-Line trucks started with the C-100 half-ton and ended with the C-130 1-ton. Somewhat confusingly, the name range changed to C-900 to C-1300 in 1963. It’s believed the diesels were available in C-1100 to C-1300 trucks. It’s unknown how much extra cost the diesel would have added.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/188da/188daeb0d699dd3a1158af470fef3171e89faf3b" alt="469000212 10160259142611396 4402"
Buyers of these trucks got a diesel six with 301 cubic inches on deck and produced 112.5 HP and 228 lb-ft of torque. Now, yes, power figures like that would be pathetic for a truck today, but these numbers were pretty healthy back in 1963. Of course, the main advantage of a diesel back then was fuel economy. But because IH never officially advertised these trucks it’s unclear how much better these diesels were.
The Other First
If you ignore the test mules, International Harvester might not be the first to put a diesel in a production light truck.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28685/28685511c3bb7e59cc3ebdb3d38c42d123333770" alt="01 1670525542384@2x"
Information is thin on the ground, but Curbside Classic found a copy of a trade journal indicating that Dodge started putting British diesel engines in trucks in as early as 1962.
At the time, Dodge was in bed with England’s Perkins Engines Company to supply it with diesel engines for passenger cars and trucks in Europe. However, like International Harvester, Chrysler brass thought Americans would like the taste of the fuel savings offered by diesel. Keep in mind that back in those days diesel fuel was dirt cheap. The tradeoff was that most diesel engines of the era were low on power, loud, and would make a modern NVH engineer faint.
Saving money was pretty much the name of the game here, as indicated by the 1962 Commercial Motor trade journal:
Mr. P. N. Buckminster, Dodge assistant general manager, announcing in Detroit the introduction of the Perkins engines, said: “The 6.354 engine is ideal for truck operators in the local, .short-haul delivery field. It is designed specifically to provide outstanding performance and maximum fuel economy in city and suburban delivery service, involving start-and-stop driving.
“We have had a very close association with Perkins for several years through our British truck building operation, and thousands of Perkins diesels are being used in our trucks throughout the British Commonwealth, Europe and the Far East,” added Mr. Buckminster. “Perkins products have proved widely acceptable and enjoy an outstanding reputation around the world. We feel certain they will be as popular with American truck operators as they have been in the overseas market.”
Among the many advantages which Dodge say operators of the new diesel trucks will gain are the lower cost of diesel fuel in most States, a low initial purchase price compared with conventional diesel units, and outstanding fuel economy of 12 to 17 m.p.g. in pick-up and delivery service. […] The compact size and weight of the Perkins unit will enable it to be installed in the same basic chassis as a petrol engine, which will facilitate repowering of existing models.
The interesting thing about the Dodge Perkins units is that most of them went into Dodge D400 through Dodge PC600 medium-duty trucks. However, there was one exception to this. The Perkins 6.354 was also fitted into at least some W300 Power Wagon trucks.
Externally, the only difference between the gas trucks and their diesel brethren was a tiny diesel badge under the Dodge logo on the fenders. If you checked option code 28-01A when ordering, you got that truck with the Perkins diesel and paid an additional $908.90 for the privilege.
This engine was actually competitive against the IH unit. As its name might suggest if you’re looking hard enough, the Perkins 6.354 had six cylinders and it was a 354 cubic inch mill producing a respectable 120 HP and 260 lb-ft of torque. Well, it was respectable for a light-duty truck. Remember, both Dodge and IH put their small diesels into rather big trucks, where the power figures shown would have made for some incredible slugs clogging up America’s byways.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0b29/e0b29437a4d4d58c4be99a7d4b107c608eedf382" alt="68300822 1093594984362448 864049"
Lewin has done some research on the Perkins W300 in the past and it’s a ridiculously rare truck. It’s so rare that the images I’m using here are of gas trucks because the diesels essentially don’t exist anymore. From Lewin:
However, there is at least one W300 out there featuring this engine. If you’re unfamiliar, that’s the four-wheel-drive version of the D Series. As covered on Sweptline.com, that truck currently has a bed, but was originally equipped for pulling horses. Thus, it’s not clear if this was an early qualifier for the first American diesel pickup, given it wasn’t really a mainstream offering.
I’ve also found one other example of a W300 that the owner claims as having the Perkins engine. My research suggests the Perkins diesel may have been a special order option. That is, you could have one if you really wanted one in the W300 and D400. In any case, the Perkins diesel wasn’t marketed for pickups in any way that I’ve seen, and the D Series quickly moved on. It wasn’t really a serious attempt by Dodge to establish diesel engines for mainstream pickup trucks.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/495cd/495cd573008810c805ac20563855328f8b3ab244" alt="03 1670525544035@2x"
According to the book, Standard Catalog Of American Light-Duty Trucks by John Gunnell, Dodge made approximately 1,000 of these Perkins-equipped W300s starting in the spring of 1962. If true, that explains why so few have survived to the modern day. The Power Wagon was marketed as a truck for hard work. It’s unsurprising that only two examples are known to survive today, one of them is shown in the video above.
Technically, Dodge did a light-duty pickup truck first, but its effort is so poorly documented that it almost doesn’t exist. However, it does appear that International Harvester was experimenting with putting diesels into pickup trucks first. The International Harvester diesel was also available in a smaller truck while the diesel option for the Dodge started at a 1-ton. Further confusing things is the fact that Studebaker started putting Detroit Diesel three-cylinder 3D-53 powerplants in 1-ton trucks during 1963. It’s believed that International Harvester and Dodge were first, but apparently not by long.
However, it does appear that at the very least, these trucks planted the seeds for the future we live in today. International Harvester and Dodge both proved that diesel technology did work in pickup trucks. Sadly, there just wasn’t a market for it yet. You could also argue that diesels needed more time in the oven. The diesel pickup didn’t really become mainstream in America until Cummins and International Harvester produced engines that had mountains of power and rock-hard reliability to match their thrifty fuel economy. But these trucks had to start somewhere, and over six decades ago these two trucks helped get things going.
- Here Are All The Different Ways David Asks If We’ve Written Any Articles: Tales From The Slack
- Let’s Confront The Three Worst Euro-To-US Headlight Changes
- Three Decades Ago, Chevrolet Built A Turbo-Diesel V8 Two-Door SUV That Sounded Epic
- The Canadian Press Is Convinced Influencers Literally Stole Their Lunches At The Surprisingly Good 2025 Canadian International Auto Show
I installed a T6.354/Clark 280VO in the Orange W300 that is shown in the video. It was not a factory Perkins 6.354. I sold it to Jesse James and delivered it to Austin Speed Shop. I ended up with it, again, a few months later.
I own a 1964 Dodge W300 Power Wagon with a factory installed Perkins 6.354. It is the only known example to have been built, or to survive. It was built by the SEG, Special Equipment Group, within Dodge. The SEG upfitted trucks according to the owner’s needs, which might not have generally been available as an “option”. It is a Crew Cab, which is also Special Equipment to the W300 that came as a single cab truck usually. The Perkins 6.354 was introduced in 1962, specific to the PC/PD 500-600 2wd medium duty trucks. I can’t say for sure which maker built the first Diesel 4×4 in the USA: IH, Dodge, or perhaps the Jeep M677.
My first experience with a diesel-powered car was a ’68 Mercedes 220D my neighbor across the street had. It had a 4M transmission and as I recall, it was not a bad shifting manual, and it definitely went around corners a lot more competently than my parents’ ’65 Olds 88. On the county roads I got to drive it on, acceleration was not something I had to worry about.
More than 20 years later, I bought a 2001 VW Jetta TDI and I only sold it reluctantly with over 160K miles on it because it really, REALLY, needed a sixth gear to deal with the elevated speed limits in Texas (and very laxly enforced) after moving there from Washington state.
The Jetta was far better than the 220D in almost every way, but that’s what 33 years of technological improvements do. But while teen-age me was lusting for 300 SEL 6.3, the 220D was impressive in its own way. And OMG, the TV ads Mercedes was making back then with their vertical wall in their test track in Stuttgart, WG were epic!
The later 300D’s five-cylinder have a distinctive sound at idle that I still love hearing today when I come across now. If one shows up on Shitbox Showdown, it’s going to very tempting. And I also know old German cars are a money pit. Probably best to admire from afar.
I have an unusual fascination I I with old fire trucks. The fact that sub 30 000 km-s old American pick-ups exist in Norway is just so cool, and the custom “coachbuilt” bodies just make them cooler.
Anyway, I usually save the ones I see come up for sale, and when I looked through them after reading this article, wouldn’t you know it, one of the Internationals, a ’63 D1300 is a diesel! I knew I should have bought when it was for sale. What I, as a 15 year old would have done with it isn’t clear yet, but come on, how cool would it have been?
But they write it’s gas in the ad too, so maybe not after all.
Landrover was another diesel early adopter from the late 1950s, but I guess they were not sold then in the US.
My brother, in the late 1970s worked on a farm in Zimbabwe with a 1950s, diesel landrover. Worked fine, except on cold mornings, when, due to poor glow plugs and problems getting replacements, the only way to start it was to drain the engine, (special tap fitted) and refill with boiling water.
Man, that IH C-Line truck is a looker. I’d love to find one and swap in a Cummins 6BT.
Man the argument to justify a diesel is always pretty narrow, but holy hell that perkins option would have cost the equivalent of around $9500 today. I don’t see how these could have been truly successful, as gas was cheap, and diesel maintenance tends to be higher.
I thought the same thing but today, the diesel engine option in a pickup is around $8k and there are lots of takers.
I know that a lot of early adopters of diesels (in the 1980s) were farmers who used marked diesel in their farm equipment. Filling up the diesel truck/car was pretty much free since the cost would be a write off on the farm. Every once in a while, the county mounties would set up check points and fine anyone running marked diesel in a truck or car without farm plates.
Also, Diesel maintenance was cheap back then which was a major selling point – oil changes cost a bit more but there were no plugs or points to change.
The diesel option might still cost around the same today, but at least they make SIGNIFICANTLY more power/torque than the gas rivals. Plus the added benefit of economy. They still dip tanks out in farm country! I’ve seen some fairly inventive ways to get around it, but for the most part, farmers don’t bother running red diesel in order to avoid trouble. I don’t know if diesel maintenance was that much cheaper compared to gas back then though, fuel filters have always been a big cost item for diesel maintenance. They may have advertised the maintenance as being “less” for the reasons you said, but I don’t think the cost was ever particularly low.
Dodge. Hell yeah!
In 1957 you could buy a Land Rover with a diesel engine, and a pickup bed at the back (example). I’ll leave it up to other commenters to decide if this is a ‘real’ pickup truck.
(*ETA there was a prototype built in 1956 that’s still around, although the diesel was swapped out years ago)
Shocked to learn that International bucked the trend on its gas -> diesel conversion and actually ended up with a decent engine. I credit the natural superiority of the I-6 engine architecture.
Also, witness a 1951 Ford F3 fitted with a 998CI Hall Scott diesel engine at WAAAM.
edit: Yes, the engine passes through the firewall into the cab.
WAAAM is incredible. I actually stumbled upon it on accident during a trip down to Silver Falls State Park. What a fantastic accident!
That would be a pretty route to Silver Falls!
Only 7 comments on this comprehensive history lesson ):
If you want more Diesel history, here’s something I wrote for Autoblog back when it was a going concern. The tumultuous history of the diesel engine – Autoblog
When it comes to medium duties, I know my ’53 3-ton GMC could have been optioned with a 3-cylinder Detroit Diesel 2-stroke. Just like those light duties, not many came with it.
IH did some annoying stuff with their naming conventions around this time. If I have to call someone for parts outside of the IH community I have to budget for at least 15 minutes to explain to them what the difference is between a 1963 C1100 and a 1967 1100C (I have the former, and for a lot of stuff it does matter, even though the body style is the same).
They were usually very good about clearly listing their product offerings from year to year, because you could walk into any dealer and custom-order almost any option on any truck you chose, up until the end. I think the lack of documents is more a case of people just tossing old brochures out, and suddenly nobody has them anymore.
On a few occasions while looking for parts from non-specialists I’ve had to explain that no, “1970 1200D” doesn’t mean it’s a diesel.
yeah, and the naming gets even more complicated because they added a D to the end of the model numbers of the C-Series trucks in 1965 (and in 1966 went back to A…)
It’s kind of amazing that we know more definitively about the life of George Washington or Julius Caesar than whether a certain engine option was offered on a certain model line within living memory for my parents.
Don’t the manufacturers keep records, drawings, brochures, etc?
Which manufacturers? Studebaker closed up truck operations in 1964 and was completely absorbed into other companies about 50 years ago. International stopped making light trucks over 40 years ago. Dodge has been through multiple mergers, bankruptcies, reports, and name changes since the 60s.
I was thinking of Dodge mostly, even if the corporate owner has changed the brand and facilities have a continuous history, but IH is still in business too, why discard institutional knowledge, especially when it can be digitized and stored for basically nothing?
They probably threw it out before digitizing became a thing. Plus interns hate you for suggesting this.
If I’m remembering my MOPAR history correctly, at some point in the Seventies there was a massive fire at the building where Chrysler held their archives. I recall reading about that as a reason why information on MOPAR muscle cars was so hard to come by relative to information on Ford and GM products
I read this too. I forget the details exactly, but I remember reading (in relation to a classic car story) about a guy who worked there at the time that saved a bunch of docs from the fire. Of course he couldn’t save everything.
Companies have found that in the USA our litigious nature means that it is better not to store too much. Everything stored is possible evidence plus the company has to spend the money to employ people to sort and hand over the documentation during discover for any litigation.
The last 3 large companies I’ve worked for have automated systems to discard files after 7 years of they aren’t specifically marked to be kept.
Oh man, a Detroit; that’s a two-stroke diesel. The 53 series is smaller than the more well-known 71 series – both are basically commercialized versions of the engines that powered so many landing craft and other WWII equipment.
A heavy thing to plunk into a Studebaker pickup.
It would have had a roots blower on it to provide positive pressure so it would scavenge.
And they have the coolest, coolest rhythm. When I was a kid, Detroits were common in ferries, tugs, and fishing boats.
Guy across the street from me was test-fitting a 4-71 on his Chevy pickup a few months ago. Not sure how it went, he’s got a cherry-picker in front of that thing most of the time anyway.
Detroit Garage on YouTube put a 4-53TA in his F350. He documents the whole process.
Sounds like a better choice, I imagine the 53 block would be smaller and lighter than the 71.
Worked with a 6V-53 in an engine test lab years ago. Never knew they also sold inline versions with fewer cylinders.
I grew up on a farm driving a GMC grain truck (late 70s vintage, I think) with a 4-53 Detroit mated to an Allison automatic. The roar of that truck under throttle – or even on startup – is permanently seared into my brain, and I think I can probably attribute some hearing loss to it.
Getting moving with a full load of grain, especially in a stubble field, involved putting it in drive, putting your foot to the floor, and humming a few bars of ‘Anchors Away’ before it would grudgingly consent to start moving forward.