Home » This Company Is Promising A Flying Sports Car In Just Two Years But There Are A Ton Of Catches

This Company Is Promising A Flying Sports Car In Just Two Years But There Are A Ton Of Catches

Flying Car Ts
ADVERTISEMENT

For decades, science fiction fans have dreamed of shortcutting heavy traffic by taking to the air in a flying car. It seems everyone wants a Jetsons-style future, and startup companies haven’t been afraid to promise it. Samson Sky is yet another outfit promising the future and this company making big promises. Samson says it’ll not only have a flying car in production in just two years, but it will also be a sports car that’ll revolutionize mobility. Oh boy.

If you’re getting a sense of déjà vu right now, it’s because every flying-car startup seems to say their vehicles are just a couple of years away. These companies may even have working prototypes, yet production is perpetually two years off. I mean, click here, here, or here for three different companies all promising the same timeframe for some kind of life-changing vehicle. Those headlines took literally 30 seconds to find.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

Those flying vehicles also never seemingly reach the market. Remember the Terrafugia Transition? Yeah, that thing took its first flight back in 2009 but it took until 2021 for the roadable aircraft to receive its airworthiness certification. You won’t be surprised to read that you still can’t buy one.

20240724 122301

Back in March, aviation blog Simple Flying published a list of all of the flying cars you can buy right now. But here’s the wild thing: all of the vehicles on the list aren’t actually in production or aren’t flying cars. Weirdly, Simple Flying slaps the Pivotal Helix on the list and while Pivotal has reached production, it’s selling electric vertical takeoff and landing aircraft (eVTOLs), not flying cars. There’s a pretty big difference there that Simple Flying is somehow missing. At any rate, everyone else and their grandma seems to be developing a flying car and almost all of them want you to pony up some big money on the promise you’ll get a flying car maybe one day.

ADVERTISEMENT

Another company doing this is Samson Sky, and things sound promising until you start digging.

Always Just Two Years Away

About Sam Picture Switchblade We
Samson Sky

EAA AirVenture Oshkosh 2024 is full of historic aircraft as far as the eye can see. You’ll find everything from replicas of historic Junkers aircraft to the aircraft that helped win World War II. You’ll also find everything fresh in aviation from electric aircraft and eVTOLs to companies promising to change the future.

Samson Sky is here at AirVenture and sliding into that last category. The company brought its latest prototype to the great air show and the company is writing big checks I hope it can cash.

Switchblade Sunset Square
Samson Sky

Samson Sky is the work of Sam Bousfield and I’ll let him hold the mic:

I have been an Architect for most of my career with over 25 years of experience in that field. Near the end of that time, I had begun creating and pursuing inventions, several of which were patented. One was a trowel tool to set anchor bolts into concrete and finish around the bolt at the same time. I was also Scoutmaster for Boy Scout Troop 6 in Meadow Vista, California for ten years. I truly enjoyed working with young adults, and assisting them to increase their self-confidence and skills in the outdoors.

Between 2000 and 2003, I hired a group of Boeing engineers out of the Long Beach facility as consultants on a side project to design a propeller aircraft that could break the sound barrier in level flight. Not even NASA had been able to do that. The engineers were granted the use of Boeing’s computers after hours, and with the help from Stanford University Professor Antony Jameson’s iteration program, we designed a very sleek pusher propeller plane using proprietary body shapes that I had designed.

Switchblade Propeller View
Samson Sky

This aircraft design was the subject of four separate AIAA (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics) scientific papers. The design caught the attention of a number of organizations including the Swedish government, which used my designs to recalibrate their wind tunnel through Mach 1.3 (hoping to gain business from Boeing). My designs also came to the attention of world renowned adventurer, Steve Fosset, who chose this aircraft design as his next project once he finished with the ground speed record he was attempting at the time. Tragically, Steve was killed during a sightseeing flight in Nevada on September 3, 2007, and our project was never completed.

Bousfield now feels the future is not in breaking records, but in revolutionizing transportation. He believes the future is in vehicles that can slice point-to-point travel time down as far as possible.

His vehicle for this future is the Switchblade. This flying car is trying to set itself apart by being both a good airplane and a good sports car. Samson Sky has been developing this since 2009 and finally flew a prototype in November 2023. The company used its findings to refine the design into the proposed future prototype below.

ADVERTISEMENT

20240724 123043

20240724 123138

20240724 123118

Speaking to Oshkosh Northwestern Bousfield said:

“The new design destroys the misconception that a flying car has to be a mediocre car or a mediocre plane, or both.”

Here’s where I start taking issue with the concept. On paper, things initially sound great. The max takeoff weight of the vehicle is said to be 1,850 pounds, which isn’t bad! It also has a 210 HP three-cylinder engine (though I’ve also seen a 200 HP engine in another brochure), an electric hybrid system, and acceleration to 60 mph in just 5.6 seconds. Alright, that’s not lighting the world on fire, but it sounds plenty sporty. The hybrid system is also neat in that it can use regeneration to slow you down during a landing.

ADVERTISEMENT

20240724 123151

Then you start looking deeper. First, you’ll notice how the vehicle is in a standard trike position. Samson Sky says this flying car will be a true canyon-carving sports car, but the single narrow front wheel seems to betray that notion. If you’ve driven any road vehicle with a single front wheel before you know they’re known best for heavy understeer and roll in taller vehicles. It’s part of why the major sellers of three-wheelers from BRP to Polaris choose to build reverse trikes.

To be fair to Samson Sky, I haven’t driven its trike, so maybe the company figured out how to make standard trikes drive better. But then you get to payload. The Switchblade is marketed as having either a 40-gallon fuel tank, a 30-gallon fuel tank, or 36-gallon fuel tank. Oh yeah, the specs seem to vary wildly depending on the brochure you’re looking at, and the physical brochures here at AirVenture show renders of the older prototype.

20240724 123543

20240724 122828

ADVERTISEMENT

The 40-gallon version seems to be for the new twin prop prototype, which for some reason isn’t yet published on the Samson Sky website or in the brochures being handed out. Let’s just use the numbers on the website for our purposes.

Samson Sky quotes a 575-pound payload, and that’s two people, their luggage, and fuel. A gallon of gas weighs about six pounds. Take the full fuel load out of the payload and you have 359 pounds of weight to play with. That’s two 180-pound occupants and no luggage. Yep, that’s a payload worse than a Honda CR-Z and just as bad as an Alfa Romeo 4C Spider.

20240724 122900

If you’re light enough, Samson Sky says you’ll enjoy a 190 mph or 200 mph top speed in the air, a top speed of over 125 mph on the ground, 33 mpg on the ground, and 9.5 mp9 in the sky. Technically, the huge gas tank should mean a land fuel range of 1,188 miles! Samson Sky also promises a ceiling of 13,000 feet.

You also get disc brakes, air-conditioning, control redundancies, and a crash structure. However, this will be legally be a motorcycle, so don’t expect any IIHS crash testing.

ADVERTISEMENT

20240724 122447

 

20240724 122849

Admittedly, these claims are a little harder to believe when you look at the prototype at AirVenture, which has the overall build quality and feel of a high school shop project. But to Samson’s credit, this prototype is a real vehicle that has flown.

Speaking of projects, this roadable aircraft will be an amateur-built vehicle, requiring buyers to assemble 51 percent of their own vehicle. Included in the Switchblade’s price is a $20,000 build program that can cut build time down to a “week” or so.

ADVERTISEMENT

Is It A Revolution?

20240724 122250

Now we arrive at the other problem with these flying car concepts. They all promise to change the future, but I’m not sure who they’re supposed to change the future for. The Ford Model T, Volkswagen Beetle, and Vespa scooter helped the masses in their respective regions get on wheels. The Tesla Model S proved electric cars can be sexy, go a relatively far distance, and charge relatively quickly.

The Samson Switchblade starts at $170,000 (or $195,000 to fly IFR. Prices go up to $770,000 for a limited edition with luxurious materials and equipment. So, it’s not going to mobilize the masses. It also requires a pilot license and can take off only from airports. So, it’s not like you’re going to be flying the Switchblade to beat traffic into the city. Really, the Switchblade solves one problem, and it’s having a car to drive when a private pilot lands their plane somewhere. Instead of renting a car or getting an Uber, they just take three minutes to put the vehicle into road mode before driving away. Is that a revolution?

20240724 122316

At least some people think so. The Samson Sky has over 2,600 reservations, but this doesn’t seem to be enough. The company is running a Wefunder crowdfunding campaign to raise another $300,000 to help the company build three more prototypes and complete the Production Engineering phase. However, Samson Sky also indicates that it’s going to need investment from venture capital to really reach the finish line. In other words, the product is two years out and it would appear the money isn’t totally lined up yet. Take that as you will.

ADVERTISEMENT

20240724 122216

 

20240724 122915

I’m not convinced the Samson Switchblade is a revolution, but at least it’s something different, and I like that. I just wish all of these companies were a bit more realistic in their promises.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
57 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Myk El
Myk El
3 months ago

♫ M.A.S.K.!
Is the Mighty Power That Can Save The Day ♫

M.A.S.K theme on YouTube

Ricardo Mercio
Ricardo Mercio
3 months ago

Breaking news: Company releases plans to “build” (sell a build-it-yourself kit of) an SUV-sized 2-seater tricycle that can’t pass the DOT production car standards, that turns into an overweight, overpriced, overcomplicated 2-seater airplane that can’t pass FAA production aircraft standards.

Extremely optimistic loss-leader pre-release pricing to be the sum of the prices of a good 5-seat car with incomparably superior performance/safety/utility and an FAA-compliant production airplane that you don’t have to build, with an added bonus that the hours you spend in traffic on your way to the airport get to count towards your engine rebuild interval.

Pros: When you exit your car to perform pre-flight checks, you can get back into the same vehicle instead of having to get into a new one. You can drive a tricycle at your destination instead of renting a car.

Cons: Everything else.

Nobody wants this.

Nobody wants a car that turns into an airplane, people don’t want a vehicle that can do what a car does and what a plane does. They want something that does what neither one can.

They want an aircraft that can take off at home and land at Walmart with all the convenience of a car and none of the licensing or red tape of an aircraft. They very explicitly do NOT want a car of any sort, they do NOT want to go to an airport and they do NOT want to drive anything anywhere on wheels or with wings.

They want the skies to come to them straight from Kunkleman Chevrolet, $0 down, 0% APR, $499 a month plus tax and reg. Come on down to Kunkleman Chevrolet and you, too, can have road rage and fender benders in the Z-axis. No credit? Bad credit? We’ll put you in an aircraft!

What they want is impossible, not because we can’t technologically make the thing, but because we can’t morally offer it. People want to parallel-park a rotorcraft at the shops, next to buildings, trees and pedestrians. They want to commute to work in a multirotor and have vertical road rage, and they want to thread the needle between skyscrapers like in the movies. They want a fantasy, not a vehicle.

sentinelTk
sentinelTk
3 months ago

Always. 2. Years. Away. Always.

Just ask Torch….

Cayde-6
Cayde-6
3 months ago

Ah yes, nothing says “trust me to build something that flies” like “I have had a long career in designing things that are famous for NOT flying”

DialMforMiata
DialMforMiata
3 months ago

It looks like a nose.

The Matts
The Matts
3 months ago
Reply to  DialMforMiata

I was immediately reminded of the scene in Beetlejuice where Alec Baldwin’s character stretches his face out to scare the Deetzes.

William Domer
William Domer
3 months ago

I immediately went to James May attempting to drive/fly his dirigible with a car attached underneath. Mayday mayday as it floated into restricted airspace. Now think of super rich twits crashing into your house/yard cause they had just had some amazing weed.

Cayde-6
Cayde-6
3 months ago
Reply to  William Domer

To be fair, they could do that without the plane part

Pappa P
Pappa P
3 months ago
Reply to  William Domer

I’m more reminded of the time Top Gear tried to convert a Reliant Robin into a space shuttle.
I would even go so far as to say that episode was the inspiration for this.

Ron888
Ron888
3 months ago

Honestly we’re now at the stage i want to mock YOU Mercedes for publishing this kind of shit.Either stop giving them free publicity or rag on them at the level they deserve

Last edited 3 months ago by Ron888
Anoos
Anoos
3 months ago

How do you end up with $600k in luxury upgrades that do not add weight?

Old Busted Hotness
Old Busted Hotness
3 months ago
Reply to  Anoos

Because they’re made of phlogiston?

Anoos
Anoos
3 months ago

Airports are usually outside of the city, with little airports for things like this even further. Best case scenario you fly to the airport and then sit in this thing fighting traffic into town. I hope the AC is great.

UnseenCat
UnseenCat
3 months ago
Reply to  Anoos

And if enough of these were actually built and became popular, dealing with air traffic backed-up in the pattern waiting to get back on the ground.

Clear_prop
Clear_prop
3 months ago

As a pilot and amateur aircraft builder, I ‘design’ planes to transport a car while falling asleep. None of the designs are practical to actually build, but it helps me settle my brain while falling asleep.

Most of the designs are tail draggers vaguely in the range of a Beach 18 with a car strapped to the top. The real solution is a C-27 (basically a baby C-130).

Flying cars are never going to work.

Ricardo Mercio
Ricardo Mercio
3 months ago
Reply to  Clear_prop

Be cool to see a plane designed to transport a motorcycle. It’s adequate transportation to the hotel and would fit neatly in a single-prop. Use a dual-sport as a base due to light weight and adequate power for common traffic. Say, a WR250R or DRZ400. If it’ll be used mostly off-highway or just to the car rental center, a Vespa would do the job well. Get Piaggio Aerospace on the phone!

Clear_prop
Clear_prop
3 months ago
Reply to  Ricardo Mercio

There are several belly cargo pods designed to hold a motorcycle, but doesn’t look like any where very successful.

This link has the best pictures, but I can’t find anything more recent than ~10 years ago.
https://newatlas.com/motopod-rv-10-fits-a-motorcycle-to-your-plane/9798/

A folding e-bike or scooter is the common solution these days to the last mile issue.

Ricardo Mercio
Ricardo Mercio
3 months ago
Reply to  Clear_prop

That’s an interesting approach to that. I was picturing something like a single-prop cargo plane, maybe an 80% scale Cessna 208 with a little ramp out the back. It would be a SUPER narrow use-case, especially when E-scooters do the job, but would be a cool adventure rig. I think the guy who made the Draco made another bush plane with wing pods for E-bikes.

Clear_prop
Clear_prop
3 months ago
Reply to  Ricardo Mercio

Mike Patey’s Scrappy has e-motorcycles hanging off the wings, no pods needed since who cares about drag when you have too much power.

Ricardo Mercio
Ricardo Mercio
3 months ago
Reply to  Clear_prop

Right, I temporarily forgot the word “hard points”

Duane Cannon
Duane Cannon
3 months ago

“…and it would appear the money isn’t totally lined up yet,” No kidding. Selling bullshit to dumbasses.

Gubbin
Gubbin
3 months ago

I remember this guy last year. Not a pilot, but it seems like that long snoot ahead of the wing would make it hard to land and scary to stall.

Old Busted Hotness
Old Busted Hotness
3 months ago
Reply to  Gubbin

You’re assuming it’ll even get off the ground. Aerodynamically or financially.

Pappa P
Pappa P
3 months ago

Sounds like the Titan submersible of the sky.
If this can be piloted with a PS4 controller, I’m in.

Mechjaz
Mechjaz
3 months ago
Reply to  Pappa P

Just make sure you also have a way out, too.

Cayde-6
Cayde-6
3 months ago
Reply to  Pappa P

Considering the PS4 controller’s battery life, that’s scary indeed

Last edited 3 months ago by Cayde-6
Boulevard_Yachtsman
Boulevard_Yachtsman
3 months ago

Specializing in flying-car 3D renders feels like real growth opportunity here.

Cool Dave
Cool Dave
3 months ago

Making the jump to calling this a “flying car” is a little bit of a reach from a “motorcycle with wings you assemble at home”.

MaximillianMeen
MaximillianMeen
3 months ago

Samson says it’ll not only have a flying car in production in just two years, but it will also be a sports car that’ll revolutionize mobility.

https://youtu.be/ZMXYrQBwNK0?t=248

As others have pointed out, this has all the earmarks of yet another piece of vaporware bullshit intended to defraud. I’m just going to assume that Sam Bousfield is a character being played by either Jon Lovitz or David Leisure. Maybe I’m out of touch, but what the hell is “Wefunder”? A Kickstarter/Gofundme rip off without any background checks?

Lincoln Clown CaR
Lincoln Clown CaR
3 months ago

Don’t be silly. Jon Lovitz is busy running Stellantis.

MaximillianMeen
MaximillianMeen
3 months ago

Good point. Joe Isuzu it is.

Col Lingus
Col Lingus
3 months ago

I have two words for this guy.

Shark Tank.

MrLM002
MrLM002
3 months ago

A fender bender in a vehicle that flies is a serious thing, which makes a flying vehicle that happens to be a car extremely impractical.

Ultralight VTOL aircraft will be the future of the “flying car” concept, however knowing the FAA as soon as said aircraft become feasible and cheap they’ll make new rules effectively making them illegal to fly for your average person.

Ranwhenparked
Ranwhenparked
3 months ago
Reply to  MrLM002

And the first lawsuit after someone crashes one by flying like an idiot will drive the manufacturer’s liability insurance premiums higher than their vehicles can fly, adding six figures to the unit price just from that.

Johnpmac
Johnpmac
3 months ago

The only way I see a flying car happening is with a rogallo wing. And even then, I agree with the other comments. Please no.

Matt Sexton
Matt Sexton
3 months ago

I’ve said this before, but I did see the Terrafugia Transition actually fly and drive, in person, at Oshkosh about a decade ago.

That thing was designed by MIT grads, had the necessary FMVSS exemptions, did in fact get an airworthiness certificate, and at the very end, financial backing by Geely.

And if all that wasn’t enough to get a flying car on the market, then I’m afraid it’s never going to happen.

Ricardo Mercio
Ricardo Mercio
3 months ago
Reply to  Matt Sexton

I think the biggest issue is that nobody actually wants it. The flying car fantasy is to replace a commute with a flight. As in, quickly take off from your suburban driveway, conveniently fly between all the skyscrapers in the city, quietly hover through the Starbucks drive-through, and land neatly in a parking spot at your place of work.

Wuffles Cookie
Wuffles Cookie
3 months ago
Reply to  Ricardo Mercio

Yup. No one ever thinks about essentially all of their morning commute taking place in restricted airspace.

The only people I know who actually commute by planes are those who work at Scaled Composites out at the Mojave airport, and live at one of the fly-in communities built around airports scattered around SoCal.

Mechjaz
Mechjaz
3 months ago

When someone’s engineering bona fides start with being a scoutmaster and making an as-seen-on-TV knickknack of a tool, I don’t have any confidence in their engineering bona fides. If they had something relevant to say, it would have come out first, and then they would have stopped talking. The late night TV pitchman energy of “not even NASA could do that!” doesn’t help, either.

I think I’d trust this guy up to but not including Oxy Clean-class products or levels of investment.

Freelivin2713
Freelivin2713
3 months ago
Reply to  Mechjaz

“…but wait, there’s more!…”

CU_Wallaby
CU_Wallaby
3 months ago
Reply to  Mechjaz

I’m willing to bet there’s a good reason that an agency that has “Space” prominently in their name isn’t interested in the development of propeller aircraft but I can’t put my finger on it right now…
But seriously, there’s a difference in being unable to do something and being unable to care about doing something.

Healpop
Healpop
3 months ago
Reply to  CU_Wallaby

NASA has always done R&D on aircraft (that first A is for aeronautics) but they never had a reason to do research on a supersonic prop plane. What’s the point when jets exist?

That reasoning has changed somewhat with the interest in electric aircraft, but I can’t imagine anyone was seriously considering those in the 90s or earlier.

Wuffles Cookie
Wuffles Cookie
3 months ago
Reply to  CU_Wallaby

NASA has always done a ton of aeronautics research, it comes before space in their name after all. But, conservative government agency that they are, they usually are reluctant to throw cash at something that a) isn’t basic science; and b) obviously DOA.

Nick Russell
Nick Russell
3 months ago

Looks like a Bond Bug with wings. Maybe they should paint it orange.

Nic Periton
Nic Periton
3 months ago

In 1910 a man called Henry Ford said the Ford Flivver would be available in two years, Glenn Curtiss was sure the the Curtiss Autoplane would be available in two years. Brilliantly, every year since 1910 there has been an article somewhere about the flying car. Every single article has the phrase “within two years”. I am working on my own flying car, and it will be available within two years. Which two years those will be is yet to be confirmed.

Ricardo Mercio
Ricardo Mercio
3 months ago
Reply to  Nic Periton

At least the Flivver was just a plane that was meant to be affordable.

ClutchAbuse
ClutchAbuse
3 months ago

The flying car future people think of will never happen in any other form than completely automated and heavily geo fenced. Could you imagine giving the average Joe an affordable quad-copter (planes will never work) that can take off and land anywhere? There would be utter havoc in the skies. Wilderness areas would be decimated and filled with trash from hordes of lazy tourists looking to get away from it all with little to no effort. These things would be falling from the skies from everyone colliding with each other when trying to visit typical destinations. People can barely function operating a vehicle in 2 dimensions. Add a third and you have chaos.

The general public has absolutely no business flying themselves anywhere. I say that as a private pilot.

Ricardo Mercio
Ricardo Mercio
3 months ago
Reply to  ClutchAbuse

This. The flying car fantasy starts at “no traffic would be nice for my commute” and ends at “threading the needle between buildings would be fun”. It does not involve cars or airplanes, but an entirely different construct that can take off from a driveway and land in a parking spot.

MATTinMKE
MATTinMKE
3 months ago

I can just imagine the moment they decided to start this company. Phrases like:

“I’ve got a great idea, but first pass me that joint”
“It’s simple, just make the wings swing out, like a switchblade! What a great name!”
“No, seriously! Stop laughing! We can do this, man!”

UnseenCat
UnseenCat
3 months ago

The problem with “flying cars” is that they tend to be neither terribly good airplanes, nor terribly good cars. Essentially, they’re a way to go out for a $100 hamburger (Well, given inflation, $175 hamburger 😛 ) at a diner a little further away from the destination FBO.

Kaiserserserser
Kaiserserserser
3 months ago
Reply to  UnseenCat

+1 to this, any time you try and combine two very different vehicles this seems to be the case.

In theory that could still be a valuable product if it’s a situation where people commonly need both of the vehicles, have trouble affording both and a combo vehicle is more cost effective than two stand-alone vehicles. LIke, when Florida is eventually half underwater, maybe amphibious cars will be a logical choice. But especially in this case, the people who have the means to buy something like this can just as easily afford to instead spend their car on a good plane and a good car.

I don’t know how they ever expect to recover their costs of developing
this thing when it’s only real use case is super rich people who think it’s worth spending the price of a small home just for some minor bragging rights among their rich buddies about their cool toy.

Geoff Bennet
Geoff Bennet
3 months ago
Reply to  UnseenCat

Seems like we’re on the road to a $100 hamburger without involving an airplane.

57
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x