I recently came back from the Goodwood Festival of Speed in England, and I spotted something quite similar to what I saw at the Porsche Rennsport Reunion in Monterey — a priceless vintage racecar on its own custom tow-truck. I just dug up the photos from both vehicles and I just wanted to share them with you, dear readers, who I’m sure are all currently on the market for a vintage racecar/tow truck combo. So here, let’s have a look at your options.
First up, let’s look at the Mercedes car transporter that I just saw. Called the “Blue Wonder,” it is truly something special:
Just look at how far ahead of the front axle the nose is!
I love that friendly face!
You may recognize this vehicle from this Jay Leno’s Garage video — Leno himself commissioned a replica build of a “Blue Wonder” to transport his Benz:
As Leno says in the video above, this was “The world’s fastest car transporter,” outfitted with the 300SL Gullwing’s fuel injected straight six. It was capable of blasting down the Autobahn at over 100 mph, with the intent to get broken racecars back to Mercedes’ workshop as soon as possible and then back to the racetrack.
“This is the ultimate expression of cab forward,” Leno says about the hilarious design of his replica, which was built after Mercedes crushed the original in 1967. Leno’s Transporter does not have the original Gullwing motor, but instead a 1980s Mercedes truck engine. Other modifications include the addition of AC (yes, Leno says he actually used the car to transport his own Benz) and a little cubby aft of the driver’s side front wheel.
It’s this cubby that is one of the distinguishing elements of Leno’s Blue Wonder when compared to Mercedes Benz’s.
That’s right. There are actually two of these replica Blue Wonder’s in existence, and the one I saw at Goodwood was actually the one from the Mercedes-Benz Museum. Mercedes provides some background on this machine on its website, writing:
Originally, it was built in the Mercedes‑Benz test workshop in 1954 for the following year’s motor racing season. There is no separation here between the driver’s cab and the load platform, as is the case with conventional commercial vehicles. Instead the body of the transporter appears to have been cast from a single mould. The silhouette is decidedly sporty: the cab, positioned ahead of the front axle, crouches to hug the road. And the rear mudguards proudly proclaim “Max. speed 105 m.p.h.”. This translates to a top speed of 170 km/h, which was more than respectable at the time. The maximum speed was apparently recorded on the paintwork at the end of the 1955 season – as documented by historical photos.
[…]
The high-speed racing car transporter was used to carry the 300 SLR as well as the W 196 R Formula One racing cars all over Europe during that season. It was the fast and essential link in the time-critical logistics between the plant in Stuttgart and the race tracks.
Mercedes discusses how this machine was actually built out of existing Mercedes components, writing on its site:
This is because the engineers and designers used numerous components adopted from the passenger cars produced in the mid-1950s: the suspension, for example, came from the highly exclusive 300 S (W 188). The “Ponton” saloon (W 120) in the upper medium class contributed numerous body parts. The six-cylinder M 198 engine with a displacement of 2,996 cc, on the other hand, came from the 300 SL “Gullwing” super sports car (W 198). In that car the engine developed 158 kW (215 PS) at 5,800 rpm, while in the high-speed racing car transporter it delivered 141 kW (192 PS) at 5,500 rpm.
The radiator grille with the central Mercedes star is reminiscent of the production sports cars, racing sports cars and racing cars of the time.
The various standard components were harmoniously blended into a design all of its own. The flowing design idiom of the cab continues through to the rounded rear end. The design is accentuated by chrome trim, from the bumpers to the surrounds of the windows and headlamps. The two-section rear window makes a particularly organic impression. Its glass surfaces follow the shape of the cab, curving around the cab and inwards at the same time.
The thing is just incredible.
On the much, much slower and humbler end of the spectrum is this: The Volkswagen T1 “Rennstall Bunker,” which translates to “Racing Team Bunker,” with the “Bunker” Term apparently referring to Art Bunker, owner of VW and Porsche dealerships in Kansas City. I managed to find the video of the stretched VW T1 pickup under construction:
The truck is about 4.7 feet longer than a standard VW Type 2 “T1” pickup truck.
The great thing about this stretched T1 is that, because the air-cooled engine is under the rear floor, the bed-floor is way up high off the ground, meaning there’s tons of storage space below the platform for straps and other equipment — no need to add a cubby like Leno did to his Mercedes.
At the same time, this is also a downside in that nobody really wants all that weight high off the ground. What’s more, loading a vehicle that high is rather complicated.
And if you don’t believe me when I say it’s complicated, just look at how ridiculous the loading process is:
Yes, hydraulic jacks lift the entire front end of the truck off the ground in order to lower the tail-end of this thing to receive the ramps! It’s hilarious!
So if it’s you, do you go for the high-speed Merc with a W196 Streamliner strapped down or the slow and wacky VW with that Porsche 550 on the back? (Actually, I found a webpage devoted to racecar transporters; you should really check that out, because maybe one of those strikes your fancy more than these two. There’s a Citroen in there that will stir your soul).
Reversing a bus can feel weird when you sit in front of the front wheels, it feels like you are going sideways when you turn. With how far forward the front of the Merc is, it would both look and feel quite weird and you would have to be well aware of any potential obstacles when you swing.
Interestingly I recently ordered the parts to build the VW in order to haul my Porsche Speedster. In 1/24 scale of course!
there are loads of classic transporters I love-the Fiat run by the Scarab team comes to mind, as does the fantastic Ecurie Ecosse truck. If I built big rigs I’d be tempted to try and recreate the old Cobra team transporter as well. Decisions, decisions!
Definitely the Ecurie Ecosse or the Fiat Tipo. Although the Citroen is beautiful as well.
I did actually see a six-wheeled Citroen CX car transporter in Norway though. It was also built in Sweden, like Jay Leno’s replica Mercedes. Why is the Swede’s fascination with transporters so high?
I dunno, if we are talking combos with the cars, then it would be hard to pass on the Ecurie Ecosse transport with 3, friggin’ THREE, Jag D-Types!
Bonus: a Corgi miniature!!!
Grandfather bought a 1960 T1new but of course factory size.
Hated the 6V electrical system. And converted to 12V asap.
Used to hide almost all of his booze in the under storage areas.
He stashed booze like some folks collect fire wood.
Got a great photo of him standing by his light blue T1.
wish there was a way to upload it.
Thanks DT.
Quick everybody. Can you name a current model Porsche motor vehicle that could fit in the bed of that transporter?
Cars, especially sports cars are getting waaay too fat and wide.
Yeah, in addition to Rennstall Bunker there were other race teams that used VW Type 2s as car transporters such as EMPI which used at least one T1 for their Inch Pincher drag racer though they didn’t have the party trick of hydraulic jacks as they merely used an on-board winch. This is from circa 1966:
https://www.thesamba.com/vw/gallery/pix/205877.jpg
Am I blue? That Mercedes is rolling art. That’s all, Volks.
First, I was all in on the Benz. But then I saw the hydraulic jacks. That is the dumbest party trick and I vote for the WV.
“There’s a Citroen in there that will stir your soul”
Ha, you weren’t kidding, that Tissier Citroën DS is seriously cool! And speaking of Tissier Citroëns here’s an old article about a Tissier CX that was used to deliver newspapers at 100 mph: https://web.archive.org/web/20170105092708/http://auto-obscura.kinja.com/the-100mph-paper-round-1777950260
I was imagining a Citroen barreling through the suburbs firing newspapers out of T-shirt cannons at 100 miles an hour, but what I read was actually even more crazy. That six wheeled Citroen helicopter transporter in the Dakar is even more awesome than these race car transporters.
Ha ha, yeah, perhaps I should’ve worded that better. As for barreling through the suburbs firing newspapers there’s the Paperboy 2000: https://www.theautopian.com/this-was-one-of-the-strangest-sitcom-cameos-of-a-post-apocalyptic-movie-car-cold-start/
Definitely the Mercedes. The VW is cool, but it’s just a longer Bus. Blue Wonder is a striking custom build. And the W196R streamliner is a gorgeous car that looks like something the Mach 5 would race against.
The 550 is much more aerodynamically slippery than the Merc, and lighter, and therefore has more potential with tuning to be made into a real track terror. With significantly less power than the Merc, its acceleration and top speed is not far behind it. Thus the VW/Porsche combo would be my choice.
Volkswagen, bitte!
I love an air-cooled VW and would use this carrier to transport an orange Super Beetle (once I’d found another one).
The built-in lifts would also be convenient for examining/demonstrating the floorpan extension.
The Benz. I just wanna pinch its little cheeks.
Not even close, the Benzes get my vote. Racing car and racing transporter.
I’m going to go with the VW. The front overhang on the Benz bothers me, can’t un-see.
Just a guess here but think the strange overhang is a way to sort of reduce the turning circle maybe? Shorter wheelbase effect.
Not so needed in the US but Europe has a lot of weird roads and narrow streets everywhere it seems.
Somebody with a bigger brain could probably explain this.
But it’s butt ugly.
Definitely this, but maybe also to make it more aerodynamic and to get a lower center of gravity. It would need to be as high as the VW if the driver sat over the wheels. Also, maybe they could share more parts with other, passenger cars like this? I get why they did it, but it’s not my cup of tea, even though I usually like cabovers. For me the blend of racecar and truck doesn’t work.
If I had my choice of any transporter, I’d take the Cheetah. Why? Chevy V8, based on an El Camino! Some guy has had it for years, promising to restore it. Meanwhile, it sits outside and rots. So sad.
https://youtu.be/wE5cHlsAdw0?si=jjG1MfFsolW4gsCD
Both are cabovers: you can’t go wrong!
I’d be more comfortable with the VW—and it would give me a great excuse to build a redneck 356 Speedster replica to go on it
If anyone’s interested, there’s a roughly 1:64-scale NOREV model of the Mercedes you can buy from AliExpress that comes with a W196 on the back. I believe a Hot Wheels version with Leno’s 300SL is coming out later this year.
Reiterating the request that Autopian articles referencing Mercedes the car company please differentiate between Mercedes the staff member. Can’t it always be “Mercedes-Benz?” Is there a need for brevity?
It’s like we keep telling Tucker, sometimes you need a “Both” option.
Definitely the Mercedes. It’s properly unique, looks great, and is fast to boot. I love the fact that it did the hill climb as well. Funny, I have the exact same photo of the Mercedes as you. 🙂
If it’s a combo and it comes with the car in the back, I’m taking the VW so I can have a 550 Spyder. THAT is my dream car so it wins automatically. If no car is included then I take the Benz because it looks amazing.
Ditto that.
The Mercedes. It looks like it should articulate, though!
The VW is cool, and I’d take a bunch of pictures if I saw one, but that Mercedes is just too awesome to not be my answer to your headline-question. It must be weird to drive a vehicle where you’re sitting fully ahead of the front wheels!
I drove a bus with the front axle about six feet behind the driver seat. You learn to ignore your car instincts about turning the wheels as you enter an intersection and wait until you’re well into intersection before turning the wheel, otherwise you’re dragging that puppy over the side walk and probably taking down a signpost or two. Not that I’d know about firsthand.
I would die of stress after a month as a city bus driver.
It’s not a lot of fun. Once you’re used to the idiosyncrasies of bus operation, the worst part is other drivers. The best part is hitting the open road, it’s like captaining an ocean liner.
Having operated equipment (articulating lifts, tele-handlers, the like) non rear steering vehicles are to my experience, much easier to drive when fully forward ahead of the axles than 2-3 wheel bases fully behind both axles.
My brain had a way easier time dealing with that then trying to calibrate how much swing out you get when you’re behind both axles. To be fair, the swing out is 2/3rds of the traveling length, so it does take some getting used to.