Look what I remembered: I said I’d do a daily feature, and a whole weekend passed, and here we are, on Monday, and somehow I remembered! It’s a cognitive miracle! And what did I remember? I remembered I need to redeem the poor cars picked to be in Craig Cheetham’s 2005 book The World’s Worst Cars! To do this, I have had an old Commodore PET computer randomly pick a page number, then I look up that page in my copy of The World’s Worst Cars, which I maintain is more accurately a book of interesting cars. I then look at what the featured car was on that page, and do my best to try and convince you that the car shown there does not deserve this ignominy of being featured in a book called The World’s Worst Cars. Am I always right? Sure, why not? Who’s gonna say no, Craig Flipping Cheetham? Let’s go to the computer and pick a new page!
As you may recall, the method used to select what car to redeem from the book is highly sophisticated: I wrote a small BASIC program into my Commodore PET to pick a random number, which references a page number, and whatever car happens to be on that page is the car I redeem.
So here’s what we got today:
We got 60! A two-digit number, okay, that’s exciting. There’s under 100 of those, you know. And that car on page 60 is one I’m actually fond of, a rear-engined Škoda! The Estelle!
Are you familiar with the 1975 to 1991 Skoda Estelle referenced here, in this book of allegedly Worst Cars? Granted, the Czech-built Estelles were mostly known as dirt-cheap, bargain-basement cars from behind the Iron Curtain when they were sold in the UK, which seems to be the perspective Cheetham is bringing to the table here. They definitely were cheap; in 1980s UK, a Skoda Estelle was about £1,549, and other cheapskate cars like the Vauxhall Chevette were £1,842.
That’s equivalent to, uh, let’s do the math here, about £6,851 for the Skoda and £8,147 today. Which means in American FreedomDollars, the Skoda would be – woah, holy crap, just like $8,700! These cars were dirt.
I’m emphasizing this because a lot of the poor reputation Skodas had in the UK was because they were known to be some of the cheapest cars you could buy, and people shopping for the cheapest possible cars tend to not have a lot of money for maintenance and tend to use their cars pretty hard. And, even with that in mind, the Skodas really weren’t bad! They were real four-door sedans, they were roomy, relatively fuel efficient, had decent heaters, and good luggage space – these were really quite decent economy cars!
The engines were inline-fours, canted over at 45° to keep the rear deck low, and came in 1050cc (45 hp) and 1200cc (50 hp) variants, with the rally-spec version having a 1300cc engine making about 54 hp.
And yet, despite their bare-bones, bargain car market placement, these were technically interesting cars, too. They were rear-engined, which, yes, did mean that they were susceptible to oversteer, which would get you into trouble if you didn’t know what you were doing, but if you did, then you could corner faster, and, thanks to the Estelle’s other traits like rack-and-pinion steering and independent coil suspension all around, these things made shockingly potent rally cars, real giant killers, with results from, say, the 1981 European Touring Car Championships shaping up like this (for the Manufacturer’s Classification):
Manufacturers (provisional) | |||||||||||
Final classification | Div. |
Points
|
|||||||||
1 | Skoda | 1 |
140
|
20
|
20
|
20
|
20
|
20
|
20
|
20
|
(12)
|
2 | BMW | 5 |
140
|
20
|
(-)
|
20
|
20
|
20
|
20
|
20
|
20
|
3 | Ford | 4 |
117
|
15
|
12
|
20
|
20
|
20
|
15
|
15
|
(10)
|
4 | Audi | 3 |
110
|
15
|
20
|
–
|
15
|
20
|
20
|
–
|
20
|
5 | Mazda | 4 |
92
|
20
|
20
|
–
|
12
|
–
|
–
|
20
|
20
|
6 | Opel | 4 |
58
|
8
|
15
|
–
|
–
|
?
|
20
|
–
|
12
|
7 | VW | 2 |
50
|
?
|
?
|
20
|
?
|
?
|
?
|
?
|
?
|
8 | Chevrolet | 5 |
47
|
–
|
20
|
15
|
12
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Look at that! Skoda, out on top, beating out – who is that? BM freaking W. And yes, they both had 140 points, but the Skoda had a better eighth result and something about the ex aequo rule something something.
So this little cheapest-car-you-can-get-shitbox is somehow a rally champion, and that somehow means it should be in the Worst Cars in the World book? The hell are you smoking, Craig?
The car was also just kind of cool. I mean, look at how the trunk opened:
Like a grand piano! And it was a pretty good-sized trunk, too. Look how many chubby, cherubic kids you can cram in there – what is that, ten? There’s ten in there!
Here’s a nice walkaround video that shows the odd trunk opening – which, admittedly, made more sense in LHD countries than RHD ones like the UK – and a lot of other details of the car:
Even in the World’s Worst Cars book Cheetham acknowledges that the Skoda was rugged and would last and was a generally decent machine. He complains about how it drove – mostly because of the rearward weight bias that’s part of pretty much any rear-engined car, like, say, a Porsche 911 that somehow does not show up in this book. That rearward bias also gave these cars great traction in snow and mud and other lousy surfaces.
I think it’s safe to say that the Estelles were some of the best Eastern Bloc cars you could buy in the west, more advanced in styling and design than, say, their Lada counterparts, and when you factor in the bargain price and impressive rallying chops, it’s really hard to understand why these cars ended up in Craig’s book. They’re not the worst of anything! Cheap, sure, probably a bit shoddy in some ways, maybe scary if you’re not used to a rear-engined car, but overall? A good, interesting, quirky workhorse. That’s not worst.
So, everyone, I implore you to open your copy of The World’s Worst Cars and tear out page 60.
Good.
(kneels in awe at the driver of the #41 car in the rally video)
I recall that when these were being sold in Canada, they were viewed as the best of the Soviet-bloc vehicles from a reliability, service and durability perspective.
Sure they were hugely worse that any Honda and Toyota. But I think they were also half the purchase cost new.
It’s a shame that Skodas stopped being sold in Canada. They are the one old Soviet-bloc brand that deserved to survive.
These were relatively popular in parts of Canada in the ’80s because they were so cheap, along with Ladas. A friend had a few Skodas and they were definitely better drivers than the Ladas. We even did a few winter rallies in them, and finished most. Biggest issue was lack of parts support. I’ve read that side-opening frunk was so that you could access it from the sidewalk for safety.
Keep ’em coming if nothing else to give the pet something to do
It had a sunroof?! There are cars even today that don’t have that!
The Estelle is cool. Craig is wrong again.
In fact, there are cars even today sporting three-dimensional stickers in order to pretend to have that!
As a teen in Canada in the mid-1980s, I actually aspired to one of those cars. It was so cool. A central European rear-engined car with racing bonafides. It was a poor pimple-faced kid’s attainable Porsche!
They were not the worst of the Eastern Bloc, but also not the best. The 120/130 series both had the radiator in the front of the car, far away from the engine.
This meant the cooling system was difficult to burp completely, these cars were prone to overheating.
Front suspension had a weird pin/sleeved setup that wore out quickly.
And the rear suspension also had an unusual swing axle setup that almost always leaked oil.
The ride was much more sedate compared to a Lada, with a very flat torque curve.
Their best redeeming quality in my opinion is that they were quite good in snow due to the RWD + engine in the rear setup.
It’s also interesting to note that their basic engine design survived for an extremely long time even after the fall of the Bloc: it would go on and live in the Favorit as a front transverse engine, even later in the Felicia and base model Fabia.
And surprisingly it made it into the VW Lupo as the base engine called the “1.0 MPI”.
I’d forgotten that later life of the engine. I had a Felicia briefly with it as a 1.3. It was a bit unrefined but quite willing, not a bad engine at all
Those Bohemian children are pretty “healthy” for living on an iron-curtain diet.
They are the kids of part officials. They didn’t have to stand in line for beet rations.
Yeah, this was post-1968 crackdown.
That’s what a carb-rich childhood diet of beer and beer will get you.
Maybe I’ve got it all wrong. I’ve been yelling “suck it, Craig” for what, a full week now? But now I see his truly terrible, miserable book is powerful, bringing Autopians together, and giving Torch a jumping off point to bring us sweet, sweet Skoda content.
Still Craig, seriously? This is like, about as good as budget cars get. Do you just hate poor people Craig?
I believe he does, the original Ford Maverick features in the book, probably as a surrogate to take a second punch for the Pinto, also present and whose platform was shared with the Maverick.
The best part of the Maverick in that book was that they chose to photograph some weird custom-built one with an open-air front seat and enclosed rear seat.
And on the second page, they displayed a Mercury Comet. They also called the Ford inline-6 fragile, the handling dangerous and the styling hideous. That’s a lot of hyperbole from someone who’s never looked at a Maverick.
Wow, this is like my ultimate car-fix cross over right here! Autopian meets Hub-Nut! Ian is basically the British David Tracey!
I have the book too, they definitely are the interesting not Worst cars in there…
I think it’s safe to say that the Estelles were some of the best Eastern Bloc cars you could buy. PERIOD
Putting this car on this list is a huge mistake Mr Cheetham!
Car magazine tended to give them some credit back in the day, certainly more than the Lada and I think that was fair. They did a great group test in 1985 called “The Untouchables” which was brave, putting a Skoda, a Lada, a Reliant 3 wheeler and a 2CV on the cover. https://www.carmagazine.co.uk/features/car-culture/the-untouchables-skoda-vs-2cv-vs-reliant-vs-lada-car-archive-january-1985/
Good read!
My parents bought an Estelle in the early 80s and for a family living in council housing it was a huge but necessary expense – my dad had to commute to his factory job and getting there on public transit took about 90 mins each way.
Unfortunately that car spent more than 90% of its time sitting in the driveway with various mechanical ailments, and rotted faster than it ever moved, so dad continued to take the bus to work for several more years while saving up for our next adventure in economy motoring: a Talbot Samba that turned out to be incredibly reliable, but eventually became a bit too compact for a family of five.
I’m curious to know whether sales of The World’s Worst Cars have skyrocketed in the last week, and exactly how much Jason is making off those Amazon affiliate links.
I hope the answers are ‘yes’, and ‘enough to get his Yugo back on the road’ respectively.
Based on the Amazon link, it’s only available used. So I’d have to imagine not a whole lot, lol.
On the other hand, all the Yugo needs is a rock and a bungee cord, so…
Don’t forget there was a coupe as well (and a convertible). I always thought the coupe was pretty cool.
I see you’ve switched from RND(1) to RND(0) to take advantage of the clock for seed generation. Nice!
Yes! I love that you spotted that! I realized I was getting the same first five or so numbers every time with RND(1).
NEEEEEEEEERRRRDDDD! (and I am SO here for it)
Location, location, location! In the UK, this was a poorly-built car from the Eastern Bloc, and for the same dough, you’d probably do better with a 3-year-old Vauxhall.
But if you lived in Czechoslovakia, this was a brilliant car that you dreamed of owning, someday, when your name got to the top of the waiting list.
My experience of 3-year-old Vauxhalls is that you’d probably do better with a six-year-old Honda.
Maybe we’re looking at it all wrong. What if these are the world’s worst cars, but, at the same time, pretty decent cars in their own right? I mean, somebody has to finish last in their class at med school, right? So, worst becomes relative. You might not want that one cutting on your brain, but, hell, they still can diagnose strep and hand out Z-Paks; that ain’t nothing. Maybe it’s the same with these cars.
That’s a good point. I’m curious what cars Torch would choose if he was forced to write a list of the world’s worst cars.
Probably anything with boring taillights.
All I know is that the Ford Fairmont/Granada/LTD belong on that list
There is no shortage of properly awful cars, undisputably worse than anything in this book. Remember that things like a Dodge Journey exist.
I mean, I think we already covered that Dodge Journeys might’ve been an only choice for people with less-than-great credit to still have a new car and the warranty and peace-of-mind that come with that. Unexceptional, sure, but hell, even for me you’d have to dig deep to find “worst cars”. They’d truly have to be renowned for breaking quickly, severely, and often.
A Dodge Journey is just the first example that came to my head of a painfully bland, functionally so-so, relatively unreliable car. There are many cars that fit this criteria, and many that fit it better than the Journey, no question.
My point was that, even if a car is an unreliable POS, sufficient interestingness or innovation can elevate it from being anywhere near the WORST car. The NSU Ro80 earlier is a perfect example of this.
I’m gonna go ahead and say that three things make a car good:
Almost every car hits two or three of these points, which is why most cars don’t suck. For a car to be truly WORST, it would have to be one of the few which completely fails to accomplish any of the three.
Unfortunately, in the age of the crossover and universal overcomplication(and planned obsolescence, and poor build quality) there are a significant number of cars which are impractical, unreliable, and uninteresting all at the same time. Nissan Rogue?
Thought was just a nasty rumor.
That car would still also be less interesting. It would be a car that’s not competitive in any way, but also doesn’t have anything compelling about it. It would like a Brett Ratner movie in car form.
Everything I can think of that would fit is a 2000s GM product. Like the first Gen Lambda SUVs – not really better than anything, not really cheap, surprisingly unreliable.
I’ve always rather liked these rear engined Skodas, they seemed like the kind of fun cheap cars that Fiat made. Boring on the outside and kind of nifty on the inside. My favorite classic car magazine recently had an article about rally Skodas, and it made me wonder why I hadn’t read more about them!
I think we have a pretty good idea of what Mr. Cheetham is smoking.
I’m not 100% certain he even exists. And I always append “Dewey” and “Howe” to the name.
Known to the hacky-sacking co-eds of “Har-vayard Squ-ayare” as Huey Loey Dewey….