Home » ‘World’s Worst Cars’ Book Redemption: Skoda Estelle

‘World’s Worst Cars’ Book Redemption: Skoda Estelle

P60skoda Top
ADVERTISEMENT

Look what I remembered: I said I’d do a daily feature, and a whole weekend passed, and here we are, on Monday, and somehow I remembered! It’s a cognitive miracle! And what did I remember? I remembered I need to redeem the poor cars picked to be in Craig Cheetham’s 2005 book The World’s Worst Cars! To do this, I have had an old Commodore PET computer randomly pick a page number, then I look up that page in my copy of  The World’s Worst Carswhich I maintain is more accurately a book of interesting cars. I then look at what the featured car was on that page, and do my best to try and convince you that the car shown there does not deserve this ignominy of being featured in a book called The World’s Worst Cars. Am I always right? Sure, why not? Who’s gonna say no, Craig Flipping Cheetham? Let’s go to the computer and pick a new page!

As you may recall, the method used to select what car to redeem from the book is highly sophisticated: I wrote a small BASIC program into my Commodore PET to pick a random number, which references a page number, and whatever car happens to be on that page is the car I redeem.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

So here’s what we got today:

Pet P60 Skodaestelle

We got 60! A two-digit number, okay, that’s exciting. There’s under 100 of those, you know. And that car on page 60 is one I’m actually fond of, a rear-engined Škoda! The Estelle!

ADVERTISEMENT

P60 Skodaestelle

Are you familiar with the 1975 to 1991 Skoda Estelle referenced here, in this book of allegedly Worst Cars? Granted, the Czech-built Estelles were mostly known as dirt-cheap, bargain-basement cars from behind the Iron Curtain when they were sold in the UK, which seems to be the perspective Cheetham is bringing to the table here. They definitely were cheap; in 1980s UK, a Skoda Estelle was about £1,549, and other cheapskate cars like the Vauxhall Chevette were £1,842.

Skoda Chev Ad

That’s equivalent to, uh, let’s do the math here, about £6,851 for the Skoda and £8,147 today. Which means in American FreedomDollars, the Skoda would be – woah, holy crap, just like $8,700! These cars were dirt.

ADVERTISEMENT

I’m emphasizing this because a lot of the poor reputation Skodas had in the UK was because they were known to be some of the cheapest cars you could buy, and people shopping for the cheapest possible cars tend to not have a lot of money for maintenance and tend to use their cars pretty hard. And, even with that in mind, the Skodas really weren’t bad! They were real four-door sedans, they were roomy, relatively fuel efficient, had decent heaters, and good luggage space – these were really quite decent economy cars!

The engines were inline-fours, canted over at 45° to keep the rear deck low, and came in 1050cc (45 hp) and 1200cc (50 hp) variants, with the rally-spec version having a 1300cc engine making about 54 hp.

And yet, despite their bare-bones, bargain car market placement, these were technically interesting cars, too. They were rear-engined, which, yes, did mean that they were susceptible to oversteer, which would get you into trouble if you didn’t know what you were doing, but if you did, then you could corner faster, and, thanks to the Estelle’s other traits like rack-and-pinion steering and independent coil suspension all around, these things made shockingly potent rally cars, real giant killers, with results from, say, the 1981 European Touring Car Championships shaping up like this (for the Manufacturer’s Classification):

Manufacturers (provisional)
Final classification Div.
Points
1 Skoda 1
140
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
(12)
2 BMW 5
140
20
(-)
20
20
20
20
20
20
3 Ford 4
117
15
12
20
20
20
15
15
(10)
4 Audi 3
110
15
20
15
20
20
20
5 Mazda 4
92
20
20
12
20
20
6 Opel 4
58
8
15
?
20
12
7 VW 2
50
?
?
20
?
?
?
?
?
8 Chevrolet 5
47
20
15
12

Look at that! Skoda, out on top, beating out – who is that? BM freaking W. And yes, they both had 140 points, but the Skoda had a better eighth result and something about the ex aequo rule something something.

ADVERTISEMENT

So this little cheapest-car-you-can-get-shitbox is somehow a rally champion, and that somehow means it should be in the Worst Cars in the World book? The hell are you smoking, Craig?

The car was also just kind of cool. I mean, look at how the trunk opened:

Trunkkids

Like a grand piano! And it was a pretty good-sized trunk, too. Look how many chubby, cherubic kids you can cram in there – what is that, ten? There’s ten in there!

Here’s a nice walkaround video that shows the odd trunk opening – which, admittedly, made more sense in LHD countries than RHD ones like the UK – and a lot of other details of the car:

ADVERTISEMENT

Even in the World’s Worst Cars book Cheetham acknowledges that the Skoda was rugged and would last and was a generally decent machine. He complains about how it drove – mostly because of the rearward weight bias that’s part of pretty much any rear-engined car, like, say, a Porsche 911 that somehow does not show up in this book. That rearward bias also gave these cars great traction in snow and mud and other lousy surfaces.

Skoda Ad

I think it’s safe to say that the Estelles were some of the best Eastern Bloc cars you could buy in the west, more advanced in styling and design than, say, their Lada counterparts, and when you factor in the bargain price and impressive rallying chops, it’s really hard to understand why these cars ended up in Craig’s book. They’re not the worst of anything! Cheap, sure, probably a bit shoddy in some ways, maybe scary if you’re not used to a rear-engined car, but overall? A good, interesting, quirky workhorse. That’s not worst.

So, everyone, I implore you to open your copy of The World’s Worst Cars and tear out page 60.

ADVERTISEMENT

Good.

 

Relatedbar

‘World’s Worst Cars’ Book Redemption: Oldsmobile Toronado

‘World’s Worst Cars’ Book Redemption: Suzuki X90

‘World’s Worst Cars’ Book Redemption: NSU Ro80

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
44 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
OrigamiSensei
OrigamiSensei
3 months ago

(kneels in awe at the driver of the #41 car in the rally video)

Manwich Sandwich
Manwich Sandwich
3 months ago

I recall that when these were being sold in Canada, they were viewed as the best of the Soviet-bloc vehicles from a reliability, service and durability perspective.

Sure they were hugely worse that any Honda and Toyota. But I think they were also half the purchase cost new.

It’s a shame that Skodas stopped being sold in Canada. They are the one old Soviet-bloc brand that deserved to survive.

Fjord
Fjord
3 months ago

These were relatively popular in parts of Canada in the ’80s because they were so cheap, along with Ladas. A friend had a few Skodas and they were definitely better drivers than the Ladas. We even did a few winter rallies in them, and finished most. Biggest issue was lack of parts support. I’ve read that side-opening frunk was so that you could access it from the sidewalk for safety.

Scott Ashley
Scott Ashley
3 months ago

Keep ’em coming if nothing else to give the pet something to do

BenCars
BenCars
3 months ago

It had a sunroof?! There are cars even today that don’t have that!

The Estelle is cool. Craig is wrong again.

Ricardo Mercio
Ricardo Mercio
3 months ago
Reply to  BenCars

In fact, there are cars even today sporting three-dimensional stickers in order to pretend to have that!

Mitchell Leitman
Mitchell Leitman
3 months ago

As a teen in Canada in the mid-1980s, I actually aspired to one of those cars. It was so cool. A central European rear-engined car with racing bonafides. It was a poor pimple-faced kid’s attainable Porsche!

B3n
B3n
3 months ago

They were not the worst of the Eastern Bloc, but also not the best. The 120/130 series both had the radiator in the front of the car, far away from the engine.
This meant the cooling system was difficult to burp completely, these cars were prone to overheating.
Front suspension had a weird pin/sleeved setup that wore out quickly.
And the rear suspension also had an unusual swing axle setup that almost always leaked oil.
The ride was much more sedate compared to a Lada, with a very flat torque curve.
Their best redeeming quality in my opinion is that they were quite good in snow due to the RWD + engine in the rear setup.
It’s also interesting to note that their basic engine design survived for an extremely long time even after the fall of the Bloc: it would go on and live in the Favorit as a front transverse engine, even later in the Felicia and base model Fabia.
And surprisingly it made it into the VW Lupo as the base engine called the “1.0 MPI”.

Jim Galbraith
Jim Galbraith
3 months ago
Reply to  B3n

I’d forgotten that later life of the engine. I had a Felicia briefly with it as a 1.3. It was a bit unrefined but quite willing, not a bad engine at all

Michael Beranek
Michael Beranek
3 months ago

Those Bohemian children are pretty “healthy” for living on an iron-curtain diet.

Thomas Metcalf
Thomas Metcalf
3 months ago

They are the kids of part officials. They didn’t have to stand in line for beet rations.

Michael Beranek
Michael Beranek
3 months ago
Reply to  Thomas Metcalf

Yeah, this was post-1968 crackdown.

The Matts
The Matts
3 months ago

That’s what a carb-rich childhood diet of beer and beer will get you.

Taargus Taargus
Taargus Taargus
3 months ago

Maybe I’ve got it all wrong. I’ve been yelling “suck it, Craig” for what, a full week now? But now I see his truly terrible, miserable book is powerful, bringing Autopians together, and giving Torch a jumping off point to bring us sweet, sweet Skoda content.

Still Craig, seriously? This is like, about as good as budget cars get. Do you just hate poor people Craig?

Ricardo Mercio
Ricardo Mercio
3 months ago

I believe he does, the original Ford Maverick features in the book, probably as a surrogate to take a second punch for the Pinto, also present and whose platform was shared with the Maverick.

Hangover Grenade
Hangover Grenade
3 months ago
Reply to  Ricardo Mercio

The best part of the Maverick in that book was that they chose to photograph some weird custom-built one with an open-air front seat and enclosed rear seat.

Ricardo Mercio
Ricardo Mercio
3 months ago

And on the second page, they displayed a Mercury Comet. They also called the Ford inline-6 fragile, the handling dangerous and the styling hideous. That’s a lot of hyperbole from someone who’s never looked at a Maverick.

David Frisby
David Frisby
3 months ago

Wow, this is like my ultimate car-fix cross over right here! Autopian meets Hub-Nut! Ian is basically the British David Tracey!
I have the book too, they definitely are the interesting not Worst cars in there…

Mortalcombatant
Mortalcombatant
3 months ago

I think it’s safe to say that the Estelles were some of the best Eastern Bloc cars you could buy. PERIOD

Putting this car on this list is a huge mistake Mr Cheetham!

Jim Galbraith
Jim Galbraith
3 months ago

Car magazine tended to give them some credit back in the day, certainly more than the Lada and I think that was fair. They did a great group test in 1985 called “The Untouchables” which was brave, putting a Skoda, a Lada, a Reliant 3 wheeler and a 2CV on the cover. https://www.carmagazine.co.uk/features/car-culture/the-untouchables-skoda-vs-2cv-vs-reliant-vs-lada-car-archive-january-1985/

Ricardo Mercio
Ricardo Mercio
3 months ago
Reply to  Jim Galbraith

Good read!

Amberturnsignalsarebetter
Amberturnsignalsarebetter
3 months ago

My parents bought an Estelle in the early 80s and for a family living in council housing it was a huge but necessary expense – my dad had to commute to his factory job and getting there on public transit took about 90 mins each way.

Unfortunately that car spent more than 90% of its time sitting in the driveway with various mechanical ailments, and rotted faster than it ever moved, so dad continued to take the bus to work for several more years while saving up for our next adventure in economy motoring: a Talbot Samba that turned out to be incredibly reliable, but eventually became a bit too compact for a family of five.

Amberturnsignalsarebetter
Amberturnsignalsarebetter
3 months ago

I’m curious to know whether sales of The World’s Worst Cars have skyrocketed in the last week, and exactly how much Jason is making off those Amazon affiliate links.

I hope the answers are ‘yes’, and ‘enough to get his Yugo back on the road’ respectively.

Taargus Taargus
Taargus Taargus
3 months ago

Based on the Amazon link, it’s only available used. So I’d have to imagine not a whole lot, lol.

Last edited 3 months ago by Taargus Taargus
Amberturnsignalsarebetter
Amberturnsignalsarebetter
3 months ago

On the other hand, all the Yugo needs is a rock and a bungee cord, so…

McLovin
McLovin
3 months ago

Don’t forget there was a coupe as well (and a convertible). I always thought the coupe was pretty cool.

Mike Harrell
Mike Harrell
3 months ago

I see you’ve switched from RND(1) to RND(0) to take advantage of the clock for seed generation. Nice!

OrigamiSensei
OrigamiSensei
3 months ago
Reply to  Mike Harrell

NEEEEEEEEERRRRDDDD! (and I am SO here for it)

Eggsalad
Eggsalad
3 months ago

Location, location, location! In the UK, this was a poorly-built car from the Eastern Bloc, and for the same dough, you’d probably do better with a 3-year-old Vauxhall.

But if you lived in Czechoslovakia, this was a brilliant car that you dreamed of owning, someday, when your name got to the top of the waiting list.

Captain Muppet
Captain Muppet
3 months ago
Reply to  Eggsalad

My experience of 3-year-old Vauxhalls is that you’d probably do better with a six-year-old Honda.

Canopysaurus
Canopysaurus
3 months ago

Maybe we’re looking at it all wrong. What if these are the world’s worst cars, but, at the same time, pretty decent cars in their own right? I mean, somebody has to finish last in their class at med school, right? So, worst becomes relative. You might not want that one cutting on your brain, but, hell, they still can diagnose strep and hand out Z-Paks; that ain’t nothing. Maybe it’s the same with these cars.

Slow Car Enthusiast
Slow Car Enthusiast
3 months ago
Reply to  Canopysaurus

That’s a good point. I’m curious what cars Torch would choose if he was forced to write a list of the world’s worst cars.

Canopysaurus
Canopysaurus
3 months ago

Probably anything with boring taillights.

Freelivin2713
Freelivin2713
3 months ago

All I know is that the Ford Fairmont/Granada/LTD belong on that list

Rust Buckets
Rust Buckets
3 months ago
Reply to  Canopysaurus

There is no shortage of properly awful cars, undisputably worse than anything in this book. Remember that things like a Dodge Journey exist.

VanGuy
VanGuy
3 months ago
Reply to  Rust Buckets

I mean, I think we already covered that Dodge Journeys might’ve been an only choice for people with less-than-great credit to still have a new car and the warranty and peace-of-mind that come with that. Unexceptional, sure, but hell, even for me you’d have to dig deep to find “worst cars”. They’d truly have to be renowned for breaking quickly, severely, and often.

Rust Buckets
Rust Buckets
3 months ago
Reply to  VanGuy

A Dodge Journey is just the first example that came to my head of a painfully bland, functionally so-so, relatively unreliable car. There are many cars that fit this criteria, and many that fit it better than the Journey, no question.

My point was that, even if a car is an unreliable POS, sufficient interestingness or innovation can elevate it from being anywhere near the WORST car. The NSU Ro80 earlier is a perfect example of this.

I’m gonna go ahead and say that three things make a car good:

  1. Being useful for its purpose of transporting people and their junk(an Alfa Romeo 4c would be a good example of a car that isnt)
  2. Being reliably functional
  3. Being cool, interesting, good looking, or subjectively desirable in some other way.

Almost every car hits two or three of these points, which is why most cars don’t suck. For a car to be truly WORST, it would have to be one of the few which completely fails to accomplish any of the three.

Unfortunately, in the age of the crossover and universal overcomplication(and planned obsolescence, and poor build quality) there are a significant number of cars which are impractical, unreliable, and uninteresting all at the same time. Nissan Rogue?

Canopysaurus
Canopysaurus
3 months ago
Reply to  Rust Buckets

Thought was just a nasty rumor.

Citrus
Citrus
3 months ago
Reply to  Canopysaurus

That car would still also be less interesting. It would be a car that’s not competitive in any way, but also doesn’t have anything compelling about it. It would like a Brett Ratner movie in car form.

Everything I can think of that would fit is a 2000s GM product. Like the first Gen Lambda SUVs – not really better than anything, not really cheap, surprisingly unreliable.

AnscoflexII
AnscoflexII
3 months ago

I’ve always rather liked these rear engined Skodas, they seemed like the kind of fun cheap cars that Fiat made. Boring on the outside and kind of nifty on the inside. My favorite classic car magazine recently had an article about rally Skodas, and it made me wonder why I hadn’t read more about them!

Wezel Boy
Wezel Boy
3 months ago

I think we have a pretty good idea of what Mr. Cheetham is smoking.

AnscoflexII
AnscoflexII
3 months ago
Reply to  Wezel Boy

I’m not 100% certain he even exists. And I always append “Dewey” and “Howe” to the name.

Ron Moore
Ron Moore
3 months ago
Reply to  AnscoflexII

Known to the hacky-sacking co-eds of “Har-vayard Squ-ayare” as Huey Loey Dewey….

44
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x